There's a reason why mathematicians speak with equations rather than words. ;-) Scott is entirely correct, the sidetone signal and the audio signal add linearly in the K3 audio amplifier stage(s) and what you hear is their algebraic sum. If my choice of words implied that the effect was non-linear mixing, it was unintentional.
Being an OF from the days of receivers, transmitters with VFO's, and modulators, often on separate chassis', getting on someone's frequency entailed turning your VFO [only] on, and adjusting it until its signal, as heard in your receiver, added algebraically with the AM carrier or CW tone until the exact effect in REF CAL took place ... as the VFO approached the audio tone of the signal, they began to fall in and out of phase with each other slower and slower, and you heard the "beat" [or slow pulsing in amplitude] between them. When that "beat" stopped [or got very slow], your VFO was "Zero Beat" and you would transmit on the same frequency as the other station ... if you transmitted fairly quickly ... VFO's in those days tended to drift around some unless they were built by Art Collins. And, thus the origin of the term "Zero Beat." Let's assume your VFO signal was 250 cycles higher than the frequency of the other station. You would then hear it, the other station, and a 250 cycle component from the algebraic sum of the two, just as you would hear a 1 cps "beat" as you got the VFO within 1 cycle. I suppose a musician with a very good sense of pitch might be able to identify the three frequencies involved [other station's note, VFO note, and 250 cps sum], but I can't. What I can tell is that there is a component in there and which way to move the VFO to achieve zero beat, and nearly everyone else can do that as well. That's all that's required for the Method 2 REF CAL. If you are deaf, just hang an analog AC multimeter across the headphone leads and you can watch the "beat" on it. Method 2 is an example of a very simple, test equipment-free mechanism that can achieve a really amazing frequency accuracy for your K3. I used the terms "cycle" and "cps" in this because Hz hadn't been invented in the ancient era I was drawing my example from, and the term "zero beat" that originated from it can be both a verb phrase or a noun phrase. I hope this clears up any misunderstandings I might have left about REF CAL Method 2. 73, Fred K6DGW Auburn CA On 3/28/2011 7:41 PM, Scott Ellington wrote: > This brings up an interesting point, though it doesn't affect the method at > all. The "beat" Fred refers to results from adding of the sidetone to the > signal tone: When they happen to be in phase, the volume goes up 6 dB, when > they are exactly out of phase they cancel, so you hear the volume go up and > down. It is a completely linear process. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
