Thanks, Bruce Sent from my iPhone 4
"Bruce Beford" <[email protected]> 於 2011年6月5日 下午7:34 寫道： > Hello Johnny. > > There is still no implementation of the temp vs. frequency data for the > KTCXO-3. You can enter the data into the Utility program, but it is not yet > used for anything. The KTCXO-3 does have better stability than the stock > reference oscillator, and in may cases meets the 0.5 ppm spec without the > implementation of the temp data. You still need to perform frequency > calibration using either method 1 or 2 from the manual. Or, with the new > K3EXREF board, the correction is done for you, if you are using a high > stability external reference. This works very well here. > > I hope this info helps. > > 73, > Bruce, N1RX > > >> There are Method 1 and Method 2 for frequency calibration on P.50 of the > K3 operation manual. Has the calibration >> specific for KTCXO3 implemented? Do I miss anything? Or, simply, is > there any frequency calibration needed for >> KTCXO3 (apart from data entry in K3 > Utility) >> Johnny VR2XMC > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
