I don't mind awfully much when someone uses QRM or QRN on
phone, BUT, one thing I think you'll have to watch out for
in the future is that there will be many no-code who simply
don't know the codes. Since they never worked CW, they will
never have had a chance to learn them. I run into this often
on 2m FM when talking to no-code Techs.
All things considered, it's probably best to avoid the use
of Q-signals on phone.
73!
Dan KB6NU
=================================================
President, ARROW Comm. Assn. (www.w8pgw.org)
ARRL MI Section Affiliated Club Coordinator
CW Geek - FISTS #9342
Read my ham radio blog at www.kb6nu.com
Trevor Day wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Also, I'm still searching for a definitive answer to the question of
whether
it is appropriate to use Q-signals in phone transmissions. For
example, is it
really appropriate to say "QRZ? this is K5XXX". Or would it be
correct to
say "Who is calling me, this is K5XXX"? Of course, using a Q-signal by
reference would be appropriate, such as "The QRN level is very high
today". Or is it?
And it seems silly to me to say "HI, HI" instead of just laughing.
Should
this term be used on phone?
Personally I have no real problems with using some Q codes on phone.
The use of HI (spelt as two letters) adds confirmation that the
foregoing was said in jest. Not all humorous statements come with
'laughter attached' :-) The smiley I have just used conveys a similar
sentiment.
Trev G3ZYY
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
