It seems to me IBM does something weird with the printer ports too. I tried using my ThinkPad I got back in 2000 as a lap timer for slot cars and had all sorts of problems. Ended up just getting a cheap desktop and putting that on.

I have had really good luck with the Keyspan USB-RS-232 dongles though.

Randy Rathbun, NV0U
K2 #1981
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Jun 13, 2005, at 7:56 PM, VR2BrettGraham wrote:

N0SS continued:


Well, I think I've found the culprit of my K2 serial comms problem... and
it's the laptop!!!  Unfortunately!

My IBM ThinkPad 380D shown the following voltages:

Voltages:

   TXD line (from K2PA100):
      Quiescent:  -15VDC
   Sending data:  +5VDC


   RXD line (from IBM ThinkPad 380D):
      Quiescent:  -5VDC
   Sending Data:  +1.0VDC

Given data provided by Jack Brindle, W6FB, the TXD line appears to be about
1.4VDC under the minimum required voltage.


That is likely to remain flaky.

I can't find my copy of EIA/TIA-232-F, but ITU-T V.28 mentions the 3
volts as the minimum that I always remember.

5 volts may be what a driver should produce, as I did find some mention
of 2 volts allowance for noise at the far end.

Interesting - the usual culprit is something to do with a software
driver, as had been suggested.  Now is this some sort of intermittent
hardware fault, or could it be that one can't assume that an IBM
ThinkPad's RS-232 port(s) don't do real RS-232?  I was counting on
getting a ThinkPad as it's on of the few decent laptops that can still
be had with a real serial port!

Speaking of serial control of the K2, a few months ago I was looking
at the chirp (cricket sound when polled for frequency data by a
computer) & the data received by the K2 does get serious radiated by
the ribbon cable - though no amount of dressing of the cable made a
difference, suggesting rather than induced by the ribbon into
surrounding circuitry, it's induced into the lines in the ribbon itself
(power?).

Have a look with a 'scope probe around the ribbon & note the
difference in RXD & TXD-induced spikes coming from the ribbon.
Anybody have any idea why RS232-in-converted-to-TTL should
be worse than TTL-converted-into-RS232-out?

73, VR2BrettGraham

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to