To all: I'm enjoying this thread because it directly addresses my two greatest concerns. First of course is human error. The second concern is connector problems.
Elecraft has addressed the first by using kit options on the K3/P3/KPA500 so that I'm more aware of the result of my actions, and also by the outstanding communications interface between the K3/P3/KPA500 units. Then there is the second concern of connector failure. Elecraft has maximized the digital capabilities within the K3, thereby limiting that cabling concerns. They have also created a fool proof RF path for TX/RX (I.e. the KISS KPA500.) Now, the Elecraft team has asked what features we would like on the upcoming KAT500. Here are mine: 1/ Maintain the integration that exists between K3, P3 and KPA500. The threat here is that if they try to placate those with max power amplifiers, Elecraft would open Pandora's Box for problems not of their making. What's going to stop the human error of slamming max power across an 8:1 SWR and causing a KAT500 crispy-critter? This would drain company resources. 2/ Keep the KISS principle in the TX/RX path. I live in a restricted deed area. About 80 percent of all new housing has restrictive CC&Rs. This limits me to two stealthy wire antennas. Two RF outputs are fine with me. Why not make a BASIC tuner with the OPTION of adding an expanded switching matrix? That way I'm not paying for something I don't need. Elecraft has created the awesome "K" line. It is based on a long line of frugal, super effective capabilities. I hope that Elecraft will continue to focus on THAT "K" line. Their forte is one baby step at a time . options, options, options, . 73, Fred, K3#2241, P3#100, KPA500 #115 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
