With good CW ops you can just save all the dah's till the end and send them all at once; if the other guy is any good he knows how to put them all back in the right place. [See QST March 1964 "Love them Dits..."
73, Drew AF2Z On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:20:49 -0400, Ken VE3HLS wrote: >It sounds like everyone is saying sending sloppy code is desirable. How >odd; I always thought hams took pride in their sending. Well formed, >well spaced characters are much easier to copy. I find nothing quaint >or charming about sending dits at 30wpm and dahs at 10 wpm, which is >typical of what I hear. Either slow down the dits or speed up the >manually sent dahs. I know there are limits on how slow you can send >dits with a bug, but if you can't slow it down enough then consider >using another instrument for sending code or resign yourself to the fact >that VE3HLS will never answer your CQ (that should be pretty easy to >live with)! :-) > >daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah dididit dididit >daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! :-) > >Ken, >VE3HLS > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
