I'm obviously not smoking the same stuff. Regards,
Mike VP8NO On 03/01/2012 13:39, David Windisch wrote: > First whack at at it: > > Assumptions: signal: 1.860 MHz; local osc: 1.860 + 8.215 = 10.075 MHz > > In 6 weeks, there are about 36.56016E12 local oscillator cycles, for the > top-band frequency given. > > Each cycle takes the reciprocal of 36.56016E12 in time. > > Think of the local osc signal as a Slinky on its side with 36.56016E12 turns > spread exactly evenly over 6 weeks. > > I'm thinking that expecting the first and all subsequent cycles not to > wander a bit in time-position over a 6-week term is not justifiable. > > Does that make sense? > > Brgds, > Dave, N3HE > Maths done on windoze accessory calculator ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
