Can someone direct me to construction guides besides the Ant Handbook. That
thing drives me nuts. hi hi I would like to build one for 40/80 mtr
receiving. Possibly others for 30 on up.

Thank you,

Tim Herrick, KQ8M
North Coast Contesters
[email protected]

K3 Serial #5934




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of stan levandowski
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amazing!

I have had some surprising results with a 40M mag loop  I built from 
hardline (real cheap)  as well as an *all out* (that means big bucks 
blown)  20 meter mag loop that I built from 1.5" copper pipe, a Jennings 
vacuum variable, and a 1 rpm motor from Edmunds Scientific.  My best DX 
so far (confirmed) is UA1CE on 900 mw on 20M with my KX1 for about 6500 
miles.  The darn thing was sitting on my driveway about 3" off the 
ground.

My personal findings:  Superb receive antenna; lousy transmitting 
antenna; highly directional; Incredibly quiet compared to my doublet; 
extremely narrow bandwidth.

It's presently sitting in the garage.  I haven't given up on it but I 
much prefer my doublet and end fed half wave toys at this time.

But frankly, for someone - anyone - who has *severe* antenna 
restrictions to contend with, the mag loop is most certainly worth 
reading up on.  It's not a toy!

73, Stan WB2LQF


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Gary D Krause wrote:

> Ignacy, I agree.  That's why I like mag loops.  I've built three of 
> them and I'm getting ready to build a forth.  They are quieter than my 
> home brewed 30' multi-band vertical and I can pick out signals a 
> little better when band conditions aren't so great.  Add the quiet K2 
> and signals pop out of nowhere.
>
> Gary, N7HTS
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:25:12 -0800 (PST)
>   Ignacy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The mag loop performance can be surprisingly good if the surrounding 
>> objects
>> are not attenuating. Excellent performance next to wooden objects, 
>> better
>> and quieter than a low dipole. Also multi band operation without a 
>> tuner.
>> But not good when surrounded by brick/concrete.
>> Ignacy
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Amazing-tp7151103p7152245.html
>> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to