Agreed, the big win on the KX3's 2 meter coverage is *all mode* capability
(and that's coming from someone who will never utilize it for that).

As far as using an HT as scanner duty in a mobile is concerned - been there
/ done that, fiddly at best.

> It would be foolish to tie up the KX3 just for monitoring of weather and
public service frequencies.

Well I just have to completely disagree with that.  If you're not operating
HF, why wouldn't you want to monitor those public service freqs without
having to install a second rig?  Sounds quite convenient to me.  In fact,
it's exactly what I'd like.  But again, I realize I know nothing about the
tradeoffs involved. KX3 still sounds like a winner.

> In addition, it is often very convenient and sometimes necessary to cover
two-meter FM and HF bands simultaneously.

100% agreed.

> The only extended two-meter coverage that *might* be worthwhile is
enough to cover MARS operation above and below the two-meter band.

(I won't go into the obvious examples to the contrary)

--Andrew, NV1B
..
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to