TJ, It "may be" right. But without your refcal values, can't say for sure. However, your results do seem to be lower than typical by a factor of 10. You may have missed a decimal point somewhere. i.e. a more expected offset would be 470 or 490 Hz, not the 47 or 49 you indicate. Check your math, and/or post your refcal value. The proper setting of the refcal calibration is important as a first step, also. 73, Bruce, N1RX
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
