It all depends upon whether you're looking for more power to compete with QRM or QRN. If you're trying to rise above the QRM and everybody does the same, there's not much net gain. At any given time, though, the QRN is fixed and as best we know isn't smart enough to try to compete with you.
Dave AB7E On 2/22/2012 2:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > *Well all this speculation is fine, however, if every station calling CQ > from the US added the ability to RECEIVE one additional S unit, I think > this would be far less expensive than a 1500W solid state amplifier that is > just going to add to the QRM already on the bands. > > I often hear signals from the US and they are a genuine 59 signal. However, > when VK's answer the call, I hear them being told they are 51/52 and the > QRM is 59...so this begs the question...how is 1500W output going to help? > > The KPA-500 is a genuine 500W amplifier and I have found it great to use > with a 4 element yagi. Expecting to work the EU with a G5RV and 1500W is > about as silly an idea as trying the KPA-500 into a 1/4 wave mobile whip. > Yes there are conditions where everything works, but not often. > > Before anyone tries to tell me about antennas in the ceiling etc, remember > I run compromised antennas all the time and I don't see how 1500W is going > to help much. I think there are more than enough stations transmitting > beyond the capability of their antennas and radios and I don't think I need > to add to the noise. > > JM2CW > > Gary > * ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
