I can't speak for the test conditions used here, but for an
independent comparison of most ham transceivers, see:
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
Sherwood sorts his table by 2-kHz (close-spaced) dynamic range. The K3
and FT5000 have the top spots. I'm still not entirely sure why Rob put
the FT-5000 above the K3, given that they tied on narrow-banded IMDDR3
and the K3 had the better numbers in nearly all other categories.
But then, as anyone on the list will tell you, I'm hopelessly biased.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Mar 24, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Adrian wrote:
> Please have a look at;
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI8T-K64LAY
>
> It seems an unfair test with the K3 filter settings much narrower than
> the 590. The 590 sounds noisier despite the extra S level.
>
> These guys seem to think its proof the 590 outperforms the K3,
> but I don't think it's a fair test. Comments?
>
> Adrian ... vk4tux
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
