*Barry, Perhaps more to the point..How does the measurement from Sherwood relate to real time performance and usability for the operator?
In what way does an operator detect a difference so small between say the top 3 on the list? Is the price differential worth buying say position one in the rankings over a transceiver ranked at 2 or 3? Whilst the ranking may be valid in the single measurement as shown, in the real world the vast majority are unlikely to ever detect such a small difference if all the top 3 ranked units were sitting in the shack side by side etc. I guess it comes down to which one looks the prettiest....:-) Oh yeah, beauty IS in the eye of the beholder right? (I say this everyday when looking in the mirror in the hope I don't scare myself too much) Gary * On 11 August 2012 07:53, Barry N1EU <[email protected]> wrote: > > Buck k4ia wrote > > > > How is the ranking decided? Is it subjective or is there a formula? > > > > It's ranked by Rob's narrow spaced dynamic range measurement. > > Barry N1EU > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sherwood-ranking-tp7560797p7560798.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- *Gary* *Start the day off slow, then taper off.........* ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
