I only said "almost no clicks" because I don't believe in absolutes. Please identify what level (in db referenced to the main carrier within some defined bandwidth) you believe clicks are generated by the K3 and describe how you measured it. I would be very interested in that information.
Dave AB7E On 9/14/2012 11:58 AM, Jan Erik Holm wrote: > On 2012-09-14 18:38, David Gilbert wrote: >> Why?? Elecraft uses a pretty effective waveform shaping algorithm in >> the K3 that produces almost no key clicks just the way it is with a >> short rise/fall time (about 2.5 msec if I remember correctly). What >> would be gained by increasing it, and why would you want people to be >> able to mess with something that works as well as it does? I'm euphoric >> that Elecraft doesn't allow it to be adjusted. >> >> Dave AB7E >> >> >> >> On 9/14/2012 1:10 AM, Jan Erik Holm wrote: >>> I would like to see the CW Rise/Fall time adjustable to a higher value >>> then 5ms. Sure beats me why Elecraft can´t allow this. >>> >>> 73 Jim SM2EKM >>> > Be course the K3 is not click free. You did say it yourself "quote: K3 > that produces almost no key clicks just the way it is" > If it´s ever possible I would like to have no key clicks at all, and > this can be done. > /Jim SM2EKM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
