Why would they be less efficient? Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:55 PM, "David Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote: > > My guess would be that you are more significantly inconveniencing the > ether now as well. As tuners go, the MFJ ones are not universally > known for being among the most efficient. > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > > On 9/27/2012 10:33 AM, Ian Kahn wrote: >> While it isn't the exact same model from MFJ, my -962D has issues tuning my >> two antennas (Traffie Technologies HX-5Bi hex beam, MFJ G5RV) on certain >> bands. The KAT3 in my rig tunes both antennas flawlessly. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> --Ian >> Ian Kahn, KM4IK >> Roswell, GA EM74ua >> [email protected] >> K3 #281, P3 #688 >> HRD v5.x/6.0 Test Team >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Arie Kleingeld PA3A <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Wayne, >>> >>> The KAT-3 tunes just about anything. >>> The MFJ tuner I have had for a long time is collecting dust now. >>> >>> No doubt about it, choose the KAT3, smooth operating. >>> >>> 73 >>> Arie PA3A >>> >>> >>> Op 25-9-2012 14:01, Wayne gmachl schreef: >>>> I currently have a K3/100 and am using the MFJ 949E and am looking at >>>> getting the KAT3. The 949 is working great, but would like input as to >>>> changing to the KAT3. >>>> >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> Wayne >>>> [email protected] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
