The real problem is that N0CE made his comment about "resonant" antennas 
to protect the feelings of his insecure buddies, at least one of whom 
reads this list, so they wouldn't be offended by the fact that his K3 
hears better on 40 meters than the "good equipment" (read: high dollar 
rigs) that the rest of his "group" uses.

To each his own. If it were up to me, I'd get a more secure group to 
hang out with. I tell people I know every day how well my K3 works, even 
if they own rigs that cost more than twice as much as the K3 does. Of 
course, I'm not terribly popular with those guys, either... ;)

73,
Scott, N9AA


On 11/14/12 12:35 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> Well ... you made your statement (that even a good receiver needs a
> resonant antenna, and you were talking about how you could hear stations
> breaking in that nobody else could, remember?)  to the list so I replied
> to the list.  How is that wrong?  If I reply to you offline others on
> the list won't realize that you are wrong and the erroneous impressions
> about resonant antennas never die as they should.
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to