Yes, an end-fed half-wave is very similar the same as a center-fed half-wave. Surrounding trees probably make more difference than the feed point.
wunder K6WRU On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:00 AM, stan levandowski wrote: > The PAR (actually now LNRPrecision) antennas, as far as I can see, follow the > same basic rules as "the dipole rules." I've used them as Inverted Vs, > Inverted Ls, flat tops, and slopers. My personal favorite method is the > inverted "L" with a 33' fiberglass telescoping pole. This gets the maximum > radiation point up nice and high. I deploy my "L" at 50/50 (half vertical, > half horizontal) . If there is no other support available, I just hang the > PAR from the pole and use it as an end fed vertical. 73, Stan WB2LQF > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > >> Another question what seems to be a minimum height for the Par to be >> effective? Yes I know higher is better trying to get a handle on this for an >> end fed. I have no experience with this type of antenna and thinking of >> field use and supports. >> >> Fred/N0AZZ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Walter Underwood [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
