Hi Don,

 I agree 100%!   The S-Meter isn't as big of a concern to me as the fact that 
the noise floor seems to be so much more prevalent on the K3 than the KX3. I do 
understand that the more sensitive receiver will dip deeper into the noise 
floor and you will hear more of it.  If I always have to turn down the RF gain 
though, and the S-Meter shows something even when their is no antenna attached, 
I think it is worth it to calibrate things.  It's not like me to read manual, 
but so far, I have a pretty good track record of reading everything Elecraft 
sends me from cover to cover :)

73,
Travis K2NP

On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Don Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote:

> Travis,
> 
> The real measure of any receiver in the ability to hear weak signals is not 
> in the S-meter deflection.  Within limits both the K3 and KX3 S-meters can be 
> calibrated to read most anything you want to see.
> The measurement of actual sensitivity is in the MDS measurement. That 
> indicates how weak a signal can be heard at 3 dB above the receiver noise 
> floor.
> When you get your XG3, I encourage you to follow the instructions in the XG3 
> manual for determining the MDS of a receiver.  With the XG3, that is a number 
> inferred by the response at -107 dBm rather than a measurement using a well 
> shielded signal generator and switching in attenuation, but the approximation 
> should be within 1 dB of the actual MDS if you do the procedure (and math) as 
> instructed.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to