Ramon makes a point, of course, but not all of us strive for "shack
beautiful" appearance.
I see many gorgeous "shacks" and they probably are a joy to
operate. I suspect many with such stations take pains to make it so
and then do not make any changes for months or years.
Then there is the other end of the spectrum (you know who you
are). I figure I am somewhere in the middle with a messy station
that gets a periodic clean-up for visitors. But my station is never
static in configuration; I am always building something and making
changes. This never lends itself to "station beauty"...unless that
is your sense of what is beautiful.
I have added a couple photo links (1st is from 2011 with FT-847 and
FT-817 still in evidence; note the venerable National Radio speaker
on the far left):
http://www.kl7uw.com/Shack2011_1.jpg
The next photo is last July showing all the new VHF gear and the new
KX3 in place of the Yaesu radios:
http://www.kl7uw.com/Shack2012.jpg
You may find interesting the evolution of the station shown here":
http://www.kl7uw.com/station%20layout.htm
73, Ed - KL7UW
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
