There is no reason to be scientific about your CW pitch setting.

Set the pitch to the tone you prefer and can hear the best.  Use a CW
filter.  If you don't have one get one.

Amateure Radio Operator N5GE

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:46:21 +0000, you wrote:

>Hi John,
>
>I read that article too.  Personally I think it is a lot of bunk. It 
>assumes perfect hearing.
>
>Where ones sweet spot is depends upon his hearing and hearing 
>degradation.  The closest pitch to 432 Hz is 429.97 Hz on my K3.
>Some people's sweet spot may be 700 Hz-- since 432 Hz may be 20 db down 
>from there!
>
>There was a link somebody posted a year or so ago.  It could be used 
>determined how much pitch difference one can detect.  For most people is 
> >3 Hz.  For piano tuners and musicians with perfect pitch it is likely 
>to be less.  You can also try using the K3's fine tuning and tune in a 
>carrier.  The increase or decrease the K3's frequency by 3Hz and see if 
>you can detect any change.
>
>Thus most won't perceive any difference between 429.97 and 432 Hz.
>If you can, than congratulations on your perfect pitch.
>
>73 de Brian/K3KO
>
>On 10/13/2013 14:03, John Seney wrote:
>> Hi Folks:
>>
>> The CW pitch resolution in my K3 seems to be 10 Hz per step. A recent 
>> article in QST
>> spoke of 432 Hz as being a sweet spot frequency based on musical notes. A 
>> quick search
>> on frequencies of real musical notes shows hardly any are at integer values.
>>
>> Note -- Freq -- Wavelength
>>
>> D4   293.66  117.
>> D#4/Eb4      311.13  111.
>> E4   329.63  105.
>> F4   349.23  98.8
>> F#4/Gb4      369.99  93.2
>> G4   392.00  88.0
>> G#4/Ab4      415.30  83.1
>> A4   440.00  78.4
>> A#4/Bb4      466.16  74.0
>> B4   493.88  69.9
>> C5   523.25  65.9
>> C#5/Db5      554.37  62.2
>> D5   587.33  58.7
>> D#5/Eb5      622.25  55.4
>> E5   659.26  52.3
>> F5   698.46  49.4
>> F#5/Gb5      739.99  46.6
>> G5   783.99  44.0
>> G#5/Ab5      830.61  41.5
>> A5   880.00  39.2
>>
>> Could the firmware be changed for experimentation with this or is there an 
>> easier
>> way to accomplish it with RIT or filter offsets?
>>
>> 73
>>
>> John - WD1V
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3222/6246 - Release Date: 10/13/13
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-----
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2012.0.2242 / Virus Database: 3222/6246 - Release Date: 10/13/13
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to