Thank you for follow-up comments.
In case of minor change, the firmware change needs no recertification. 
A great improvement in transmission requires the recertification.
For example, KX-3 became allowed to transmit FM and AM after the first lot.
Equipment with ESSB mode over 3 kHz width (=Japanese limit) may not be accepted 
by JARD. 
 
Jun, JI1TLL
 
> From: wun...@wunderwood.org
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:14:32 -0800
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3   
> orK3X
> 
> One Japanese amateur had the opinion that firmware upgrades would require 
> recertification. Perhaps that is true, but it also might be just as accurate 
> as my opinion about what the FCC would do. If I were a betting man, I would 
> not bet on my opinion about the FCC.
> 
> Basically, let's not jump to the conclusion that the Japanese are trying to 
> exclude US radios. Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality 
> transmitters off the air in their country. That is a good thing.
> 
> wunder
> K6WRU
> 
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Bill Frantz <fra...@pwpconsult.com> wrote:
> 
> > But Elecraft doesn't have to get a new type approval from the FCC every 
> > time they change the firmware. The post I quoted (included below) indicates 
> > that the Japanese manufacturers need to get approval from JARD whenever 
> > they want to change the firmware. Having the expense of jumping thru a 
> > bureaucratic hoop would certainly act as a disincentive.
> > 
> > Cheers - Bill
> > 
> > On 1/7/14 at 6:32 PM, wun...@wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) wrote:
> > 
> >> Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
> >> different. --wunder
> >> 
> >> On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz <fra...@pwpconsult.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
> >>> product improvement on our
> >> Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
> >>> 
> >>> On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
> >>>> revised even now.
> >>>>  JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
> >>>> machine.
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Bill Frantz        | gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
> > (408)356-8506      | to C's continuing support of | 16345 Englewood Ave
> > www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns.             | Los Gatos, CA 95032
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> > 
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> --
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
                                          
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to