While off topic, hi.  Look into the old TV signal simulator generator for the 
old Satellite band.  They had some good test sets for modulating a 30 MHz FM 
bandwidth.  It would be a good place to start.  They operated in the 3.7 to 4.2 
GHz band, but the test set had the modulation format at 70 MHz.  Spread 
spectrum would be the next area to look.  That was all wideband digital.  A lot 
of 900 MHz SS stuff is available with a little effort.  A thought.

Mel, K6KBE





On Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:57 PM, Niel Skousen <[email protected]> 
wrote:
 
Good Evening All,

This is low power, just not strictly QRP operating.  I'm looking for input and 
advice ** off the list **

I'd like to do some experiments with QPSK and GMSK at 450 - 900 MHz, and 
looking for advice on howto inexpensively do so since I dont have  digital 
modulation signal generator.   I'd like to look at some modulation sideband 
effects at +/- 5x the modulation frequency.    Ideally I'm looking at 5Mbps 
QPSK, but lower bandwidths (~1Mbps) might work for me as similar answers to my 
question ( interference suppression ).

I have an HP 8921 for Spectrum analysis and a decent scope, but no good way to 
generate and decode the digital stream.

Any thoughts for on-the-cheap approach would be appreciated (eval kits etc)

Thanks for the Bandwidth

Niel
WA7SSA
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to