Thanks for the ideas guys.

I've emailed support at Elecraft to see what their thoughts are. I did some additional testing.

I connected K3-B to my KPA-500/KAT-500 combo and I'm finding that the K3-B sees a 1.5:1 swr while driving the KPA-500. The SWR of the KPA and KAT swr meters both measure near 1.0:1. All other bands show 1.0:1 while driving the amp. K3-A sees a 1.0:1 SWR on 40m while driving the KPA-500.

Something is up with measuring SWR on 40m with K3-B, even after calibrating the wattmeter.

Rich - N5ZC

On 7/19/2014 7:10 PM, Richard Thorne wrote:
I have a strange swr issue I'm trying to resolve.

I have two K3's for an SO2R setup, lets call them K3-A and K3-B. On 40 meters the swr that the K3 displays on K3-A indicates what is to be expected 1.5:1 at 7.001 and 2.0:1 at 7.105, however on K3-B the K3 displays 1.0:1 at 7.001 and 2.7:1 at 7.105.

I'm using the same exact coax to connect to both rigs and I'm going directly to ant port 1 on both rigs. Neither rig has the ATU in line (K3-B doesn't even have an internal ATU). The antenna is a 2 element 40m yagi.

I've used an external Daiwa swr/power meter which agrees with rig K3-A's swr when connected to either radio.

So it appears that the displayed swr on rig K3-B is giving an incorrect reading.

Any ideas?  Is it time to calibrate the wattmeter?

Thanks

Rich - N5ZC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to