Just so we all don't confuse Mark, I think he asked a really good question,

If the coax is loss-less [we'll all let you know when you can buy that kind:-))], then what the other Fred said is true. Unfortunately, all transmission lines, of whatever flavor, do have losses. Compared to open wire lines, loss in coax is high.

In the early 60's at Keesler AFB, I passed my free time at K5TYP ... I enjoyed the people and the activity there. We had a tribander that seemed to receive [sort of}, but we couldn't work anyone on it, and the SWR was 1:1 on 20, 15, and 10. A puzzle. During one of the testing sessions, someone swept the frequency from 10 down to 20 to go do it again, and the SWR was 1:1 all the way down. Our coax had lain open on the ground for several years in Biloxi MS, and was full of water. It was basically the longest dummy load in Harrison County MS before any RF got to the antenna. And, it had a 1:1 SWR

Depending on the loss in your coax, your feedline will look more or less like a transformer. More loss means it begins to dominate the transformer equation and your SWR at the shack looks better and better.

Again, the bottom line ... Don't stress about SWR unless it causes a problem for your transceiver. If the transmitter is happy, so you should be.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014
- www.cqp.org

On 9/2/2014 6:57 PM, Fred Townsend wrote:

Hello Mark: Question? What is the SWR of a mile long piece of coax if
it is unterminated. Answer 1:1. That is because a long length coax
will act as a matching transformer. Actually it doesn't have to be
too long as you found out. If reading is not better in the shack
something is wrong.

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to