Mike, I think you will find that the vertical is a better antenna for stations 
more than 2,000 miles from your QTH, differing results for stations between 
1,000 and 2,000 miles and poorer for stations nearer than 1,000 miles.  An NVIS 
attic antenna or a stealth low dipole may be a beneficial addition for nearby 
stations if you can hide it from your neighbors.  Verticals work better where 
the ground is conductive in the far field because it helps the take off 
antenna.  By the far field, I mean beyond the practical distance for radials.  
South Texas and Florida are usually good.  Desert areas such as West Texas and 
Arizona not so good.  Wet areas are good, dry areas are bad, conductive 
deposits in the earth are good, but no doubt you will probably not want to move 
to get better vertical conditions.  
 
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ & Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart


On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:36 AM, "mbyr...@tampabay.rr.com" 
<mbyr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
 


Good Day,

I am currently using a modified Cushcraft R8 with my Elecraft K1. I had never 
considered a vertical before the R8 and this was a compromise with my 
neighbors. Originally I had a dipole but that was only for 40 meters. I bought 
the R8 with the idea of multiple bands without a tuner. Because of restrictions 
here, I was only allowed one antenna. I did a series of comparisons between the 
dipole and vertical. The dipole was much quieter with the vertical being quite 
noisy. With the noise on the vertical also came a lot of DX I couldn't hear on 
the dipole. This was not a very scientific comparison but it satisfied me. The 
dipole came down and the vertical went up on the roof.

With the R8 I have worked other QRP stations with similar antennas on every 
continent. This only shows if conditions allow, you can work into anywhere. 

I do agree about the vertical being a compromise as a single element. It will 
do a great job laying down a signal at low angles which sometimes gives you an 
advantage. This all depends on your installation and ground losses. I would 
still prefer to have a phased array of verticals than have a beam on a tower. 
This is opposite of my opinion twenty years ago. 

Mike, AC4UR
http://sunbyrdpress.blogspot.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to wrco...@yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to