On Sat,9/20/2014 11:34 PM, Vic Rosenthal K2VCO wrote:
The K3 is still a great transceiver. For my purposes, there is nothing
better out there for a reasonable price. But the competition isn't
sitting still. And as everybody knows, there are some areas in which
the K3 could be markedly improved (cleaning up the audio artifacts in
QSK is my personal favorite).
Hi Vic,
You've been busy moving, and may have missed this.
k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf
This report, which simply compares and analyzes ARRL measurements, shows
that in the realm of producing a clean signal, the K3 is an order of
magnitude better than its closest competitor, the TS590S, two orders of
magnitude better than Icom's "best," and FOUR orders of magnitude better
than Yaesu. For the non-math folks among us, an order of magnitude is
10X. So the K3 is more than 100 times cleaner than ICOM's most expensive
stuff, and more than 10,000X cleaner than even the most expensive of
current Yaesu rigs.
BTW -- I was hanging with K6RBtodaypreparing for CQP, and he's hoping to
look you up on an upcoming trip to 4X.
73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
