Phil,
That's the right question. There is no doubt that turning a pure FSK
modulated signal into an FSK + AM modulated (QAM) signal increases
bandwidth. The question is how much and how far down are the additional
side bands. I'm sure there are guys here who can either calculate or
measure the effect. It would be interesting to know the answer.
As a practical matter, mother nature does this to almost all FSK signals
via propagation effects. Often received mark and space amplitudes
different by a LOT more than the amounts we're talking about here. It
is interesting to watch this. Given this mother nature bandwidth
smearing, it is doubtful that the real world impact of K3 QAM vs pure
FSK is significant.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 11/11/2014 06:56, Phil Wheeler wrote:
As a practical matter "My K3 increases power by 10% when in Space as
opposed to Mark": is this really something to be concerned about?
Phil W7OX
On 11/10/14 10:51 PM, Brian wrote:
And what if this was done this with the standard 2.7 KHz filter?
Filter passband ripple has the the stock answer to what people are
observing.
Also what about dynamic vs static differences. Is it possible in the
dynamic situation the differences would be greater?
It does sound like there is some confusion precision with accuracy. A
measuring device might offer high precision and resolution but lower
absolute accuracy. People often make accurate difference measurements
with with a device which less accurate than the delta one observes.
If the difference are small, they can be quite accurate.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 11/11/2014 02:13, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> My K3 increases power by 10% when in Space as opposed to Mark.
Two things here ... 10% is abut 0.4 dB. How did you measure the power
difference and did you do so with an instrument with enough resolution
to accurately measure that difference at the power level you were using?
For example a Bird Wattmeter can't possibly measure with that level of
accuracy nor is one likely to be able to read an analog meter that
closely.
I have measured my K3 on RTTY with a wattmeter traceable to NIST and
specified for 3% accuracy and have done so at four specific power
levels (25, 55, 80 and 105 Watts) to eliminate any ALC non-linearity
or PA compression from consideration. The specific Mark/Space power
levels were measured by placing the rig into transmit in FSK_D mode
with the FSK input closed (Mark), measuring the power output for a
given power setting, then opening the FSK input and noting the PO
(and change).
In all cases, the difference between MARK and SPACE was less than 2%
(less than the meter's specified accuracy) and at two power levels (55
and 80 W) the measured difference was less than 0.2W (<0.2 dB at 55W).
These measurements were made with standard "High tones" (2125/2295 Hz)
and the K3 was equipped with the optional 2.8 KHz, 8 pole IF filter.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2014-11-10 8:42 PM, Bill Lewis wrote:
I am looking for information on how to eliminate incidental AM when
using
FSK-D.
My K3 increases power by 10% when in Space as opposed to Mark.
Thanks much, Bill, W8NN
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2247 / Virus Database: 4189/8045 - Release Date: 11/10/14
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
