As long as we're on the "shrinking" of the P3 subject. I would always have
preferred a P3/VGA only! That is, one as small as possible with the ability
to drive and external monitor but containing NO display itself. I hardly
EVER look at the P3, unless it's to set a parameter. I have an old 15"
leftover PC monitor that it just perfect for the outboard display. I find
that it's my go-to set-up since it's up and running in a second with just
two button pushes. (K3 and monitor).
73, Charlie k3ICH
----- Original Message -----
From: "dyarnes" <[email protected]>
To: "Elecraft Reflector" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] (Mini)P3 v SubRX
Hi All,
That modified (cut down) version of the P3 by WA6KBL is quite intriguing.
Someone else has suggested that doing this could cause some interference
action with the display, which is too bad if it is true. It seems to me
that, since the PX3 works fine in a smaller enclosure, why wouldn't the P3
work O.K. as well? Personally, I wish the P3 had less bulk, particularly
since it seems excessive and clumsy. I know the P3's dimensions were
determined, at least in part, to correlate to the K3's dimensions.
However, so much wasted space would be nice to eliminate if possible.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
