Matches my experience, Al. This humble arrangement of wires radiates somewhere along a continuum between "vertical with one or more radials" (over perfect ground) and "inverted V mounted at a weird angle" (in free space). I think that explains the variance in loss, takeoff angle, etc.
Most portable antennas live between these two extremes. Your analysis proves the operator is better off enjoying the effect of radiation than obsessing over its shape. Wayne N6KR On Jul 22, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Al Lorona <alor...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I wasn't clear enough in my last post. Let me try to put this idea out there > one more time. > If you have an antenna modeling program like EZNEC you can perform a simple > experiment to illustrate a strange behavior of ground loss. > …. > I will re-state my original thesis this way: If you have perfectly conducting > ground, there is no ground loss. If you have perfectly insulating ground, > there is no ground loss. There's always some ground conductivity in between > those extremes at which the loss is maximum. This value depends on the > frequency. > > Al W6LX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
