Jim, AB4CZ gave you an excellent summary.

If you think you'd like to use the 'scope for general bench work to look at
waveforms, etc., on HF gear, then look for one with at least a 200 MHz
bandwidth. 

Smaller bandwidth scopes are fine for a simple check on your transmitter
waveform, but one of the greatest advantages to a scope is being able to see
things you can't see otherwise - parasitics, the transition waveforms when
keying, edges of clock signals, etc. While the fundamental frequency of the
waveform may only be a few MHz, the frequency of the squiggles and other
artifacts on the signal is much, much higher. For those applications a
general 'rule of thumb' is to use a 'scope with at least 10 times the
highest frequency you'll be interested in, the higher the better. 

If you try to observe signals on a narrower bandwidth oscilloscope, the
higher-frequency information is simply lost. The displayed waveform will
look much cleaner that it really is! For example, if you try to observe a 50
MHz square wave on a 50 MHz oscilloscope it'll show you a nice, clean sine
wave, not a square wave. All of the higher-frequency information that makes
the edges of the square wave sharp will be lost. To get a decent
representation of the actual waveform you'd need at least a 500 MHz
oscilloscope. 

At today's Hamfest prices, the price difference between a basic waveform
monitor and a good general purpose scope is often small, and with the latter
you have an instrument that will  prove itself quite valuable over time if
you enjoy tinkering with circuits on the bench.

Ron AC7AC

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to