Deed is done! Just made my 1st digi QSO JT-9 at 5W 460 miles. Got it
imported to DXLab logbook - all is right with the world.
Thanks for all the comments - they were very helpful.
73
Mark, ab7mp
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 5:41 PM
To: Peter Pauly
Cc: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Get the kids off the street - making my move!
Oh I agree on that too. The typical JT-65 or JT-9 QSO takes a long time
like 5 to 7 minutes or more under good conditions. But the software /
mode will dig signals out of the noise one can't hear by ear.
I do encourage one to get their CAT interface working correctly with the
software. Makes life so much easier.
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 11/19/2015 7:32 PM, Peter Pauly wrote:
For James:
I don't see as much JT9 as I do JT65, but JT9 works better for weaker
signals (even weaker than JT65) so you can work stations that are farther
away or under worse conditions.
JT65/JT9 is like shooting fish in a barrel (it's easy to make a lot of
distant contacts).
I also have to confess that it's so slow, I usually do something else
while I'm making QSO's.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
