I wasn't clear on this point: You don't need any new firmware to try the 
experiment. Just use K3 Utility to temporarily alter the bandwidth of the 6-kHz 
filter as explained in the setup instructions below.

In fact, you don't really even need K3 Utility. You can change the filter 
bandwidth using the CONFIG:FLx BW menu entry, where 'x' is the number assigned 
to your 6-kHz filter.

Wayne
N6KR


On Feb 3, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Wayne Burdick <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> If you have...
> 
> - really ugly noise sources that neither of the K3/K3S noise blankers 
> completely clean up, and 
> 
> - a 6-kHz crystal filter, and
> 
> - a narrow crystal filter (200-1000 Hz)
> 
> ...then you may want to try an experimental technique I've been using the 
> past couple of days. In many cases it produces dramatically improved 
> blanking, at least in narrow-band modes (CW, PSK, FSK). I've been able to 
> hear many weak signals that I simply couldn't hear before.
> 
> It may also work for SSB signals in conjunction with a 15-kHz crystal filter, 
> but I haven't tried that yet.
> 
> The kind of noise I'm talking about is often quite unstable, with a buzzy 
> sound, possibly drifting around a bit in frequency and amplitude. Light 
> dimmers, switching power supplies, and various other devices create such 
> noise. The noise may be narrowband: as you tune the VFO, you may find there's 
> a "hump" of noise that's anywhere from 2 kHz to 50 kHz wide. It may also have 
> very complex waveform with multiple noise pulses back-to-back in a burst. 
> 
> These types of noise are difficult to deal with. The IF blanker's signal path 
> may be too wide (0.2 to 2 MHz), resulting in too little energy in-band to 
> trigger the gating signal. The DSP blanker's RF signal path may be too 
> narrow, making it hard for the DSP to distinguish noise from desired signal.
> 
> * * *
> 
> Setup:
> 
> 1. Connect the radio to a computer running K3 Utility. Go into the 
> Configuration / Configure Crystal Filter setup screen.
> 
> 2. Find your 6-kHz filter (probably FL1 or FL2). Now the fun part: fake out 
> the firmware by entering a bandwidth for this filter that's just 50 Hz wider 
> than your narrow CW filter (ideally 250-500 Hz). *Do not* change the filter 
> offset. But *do* make sure that the 6-kHz filter's CW and DATA enable boxes 
> are checked.
> 
> 3. Click "OK" to save this experimental crystal filter configuration setup. 
> 
> 4. You will now find that when the WIDTH control is rotated from, say, 0.40 
> to 0.45, the XFIL selection will jump from something like FL4 directly to FL1 
> or FL2 (your 6-kHz filter). That, hopefully, is the boundary where magic may 
> occur, below.
> 
> * * *
> 
> The Experiment:
> 
> 1. Find one of your most offensive local noise sources. I have them on most 
> low bands. The stronger the amplitude the better. Narrowband sources may 
> provide the most dramatic results.
> 
> 2. Back down the AF gain control, then *turn off AGC*. You may need to use 
> the RF gain to keep the signal from clipping. 
> 
> NOTE: The reason for doing this test without AGC is to make sure you can hear 
> the full effect of applied noise reduction. AGC flattens out the receiver's 
> audio response, making it hard to compare different settings. (If you find 
> that the noise-remediation trick works, you can later turn AGC back on, and 
> while the effect won't be as obvious, any benefit in signal-to-noise ratio 
> will still apply.)
> 
> 3. Select CW mode and adjust the WIDTH control for your narrow filter's 
> bandwidth (example: "BW 0.40"). 
> 
> 4. Turn on the noise blanker (tap NB) and hold NB (LEVEL) to access the 
> blanker parameters. 
> 
> 5. Set the IF blanker to OFF (VFO B). Then experiment with the DSP blanker 
> settings (VFO A) to obtain the best possible reduction in signal.
> 
> 6. While still the LEVEL parameters are still displayed, adjust the WIDTH 
> control to the next step up (example: "BW 0.45"). This should kick in the 
> 6-kHz filter, *but the DSP bandwidth and filter graphic will still show a 
> narrow passband*. In other words, you're widening out the crystal filter but 
> making very little change in the DSP's internal filter bandwidth (15 kHz IF, 
> and AF).
> 
> 7. Now re-optimize the DSP noise blanker settings for the 6-kHz filter case. 
> Did the noise drop? (If you have a signal generator, e.g. an Elecraft XG3, 
> you might put an antenna on it and generate a weak signal right in the middle 
> of the noise to get more definitive results.)
> 
> 8. Try it on other noise sources. It may help on some but not others, due to 
> the wide variance in noise signals.
> 
> Please log your results and report them to the list, at least until Eric 
> shuts down the thread :)
> 
> * * *
> 
> IMPORTANT:
> 
> As you can imagine, opening up the crystal filter bandwidth much wider than 
> the DSP bandwidth will make the receiver more susceptible to in-band 
> interference. If necessary, use RF GAIN, preeamp, and attenuator settings to 
> reduce all interfering signals to a manageable level.
> 
> I find there are many occasions on which better blanking is really critical, 
> even if gain must be reduced in order to take advantage of it. 
> 
> * * *
> 
> If we get enough positive responses from this experiment, we'll provide a 
> simply, intuitive way of selecting the 6-kHz filter for noise blanking 
> purposes. And maybe the 15 kHz filter for SSB use, if applicable. For 
> example, we might add more selections to the DSP blanker parameter (presently 
> t1-1 to 3-7). Suggestions welcome.
> 
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to