I recently noticed that I also have a stuck segment on my KX3 S-Meter. However, mine is the S-9 segment.
73 Greg, WY1X On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: KX2 real life power (Tom Crayner) > 2. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Dave Cole) > 3. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Dale Putnam) > 4. KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? (Thorpe, Jeffrey) > 5. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Ken G Kopp) > 6. Re: KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? (David Box) > 7. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Joe Subich, W4TV) > 8. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Michael Walker) > 9. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Jim Brown) > 10. Re: K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? (Helmut Berka) > 11. Let me build your K2 (Alan Price) > 12. Re: KX3 / FLDIGI Question (James Bennett) > 13. Re: KX3 / FLDIGI Question (Jorge Diez - CX6VM) > 14. K3/100 for sale (thomas branton) > 15. KX2 Shipping Status (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) > 16. Re: KX2 Shipping Status (Peter Pauly) > 17. Re: KX2 real life power (Wayne Burdick) > 18. Re: KXPD3 thumb screw (Ron D'Eau Claire) > 19. Re: KX2 Shipping Status (Walter Underwood) > 20. K-Pod modification for K3S (Randy Farmer) > 21. Re: KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? (Thorpe, Jeffrey) > 22. P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea (Mike VE3YF) > 23. Re: P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea (Alan Bloom) > 24. KX3 S-meter segment stuck (Erik Basilier) > 25. Re: KX3 S-meter segment stuck (Erlend Grimseid) > 26. Re: P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea (Mike VE3YF) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:50 -0400 > From: Tom Crayner <[email protected]> > To: david perry <[email protected]> > Cc: elecraft <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 real life power > Message-ID: > <cajhnfxbmd6aknkxxewtdcrioeaydwjh3nx1b+asq1k1rdh0...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Sounds like the batteries are possibly suspect. > > A KX3 will give out 10W down to 10V according to the firmware release > (v2.38), and although I haven't personally run my batteries down that low I > haven't seen any behavior to indicate otherwise (in other words I'm getting > 10W out, not 3 or 4W as you are seeing). Check and see if you are on that > FW release. > > On the KX2 I am set at 5W out (not the full 10W due to duty cycle of the > digital I use) and I am still getting the full 5W out with the battery pack > about half depleted (if I believe the amp hours reading). > > Tom, W2YF > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:45 AM, david perry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Im wondering what KX2 users are finding to be the output power when on >> internal battery. I ask because I am using a friends KX3 at the moment and >> whilst on external power it gives full spec, on internals the power drops >> to 3 or 4 watts out. Is the KX2 better than this or is that all there is, >> even on the new rig? >> >> David >> G4YVM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:58:53 -0700 > From: Dave Cole <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 06:30 -0500, Chris L wrote: >> A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a >> cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the >> day and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed >> this. ?There is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my >> old Icom 706 shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 >> without). I spoke with someone at the house and confirmed that this >> was the problem by shutting down the device for an hour. >> Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law lives with them and insists >> on using the baby monitor all day and night. >> Chris >> KB9SDX >>? > > Chris, > Make sure they know that the baby monitor is transmitting every word > they say, (assuming it does). ?That will more than likely change their > minds. > --? > > 73's, and thanks, > Dave (NK7Z) > For software/hardware reviews see: > http://www.nk7z.net > -- > > 73's, and thanks, > Dave (NK7Z) > For software/hardware reviews see: > http://www.nk7z.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:14:25 +0000 > From: Dale Putnam <[email protected]> > To: Chris L <[email protected]>, Elecraft > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: > > <co2pr0601mb0950df4848e55a3ac0041ac3d0...@co2pr0601mb0950.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I certainly hope they NEVER speak their credit card numbers.. their plans for > the weekend, vacation, trips away from the house, bank accounts, security > questions, or pretty much anything else. In today's world with so much > concern about identity theft, credit card information... listening in, like > they are providing, would provide enough information to very easily swipe an > ID or two.. or three.. apply for credit cards, buy a car, or almost anything > else. Wow... the possibilities are endless, and 99% are not good at all. > > Aside from the simple fact that it is a transmitter, and causes an issue. > > Good luck getting them to shut it off... > > IF it is a "security thing" for an elderly.. maybe the explanation of Life > Line.. or some similar monitoring system would help... or the purchase of a > pair of family service walky talkies, from the box stores, for less than 40 > would work better.. that would certainly give the coverage, and only transmit > when needed. > > > Have a great day, > --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy > > > > ________________________________ > From: Elecraft <[email protected]> on behalf of Chris L > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > > I believe the manual states that it takes a watt or two of power at the > antenna connector to set off the HI-RFI warning. Imagine my surprise when I > began seeing the warning on my brand new K3S just days after I'd assembled > it. Almost everyone else who has seen this error has been using a K3 in a > contest environment with multiple transmitters, so I was particularly > stumped as there are no other transmitters in my shack (everything is > boxed) and no active hams in my neighborhood. I did some testing and traced > it to a signal coming in on my 6 meter antenna, which when I disconnected > it caused the HI-RFI warning to go away. Using a VHF capable SDR in > wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal on 49.850 and traced it to... > > A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a > cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the day > and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed this. There > is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my old Icom 706 > shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 without). I spoke with > someone at the house and confirmed that this was the problem by shutting > down the device for an hour. Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law > lives with them and insists on using the baby monitor all day and night. > > I will continue to press for a diplomatic solution (possibly offering to > buy them a newer 800/900MHz unit), but should I fail at that, is this > something I should worry about as far as damaging my K3S? I find it hard to > believe that a baby monitor is pumping out more than 1 watt, so I'm > inclined to believe that the K3S is being a bit overprotective. This plus > the fact that my 6 meter antenna is a PAR Omniangle which is > omnidirectional and according to PAR has no appreciable gain. I'm tempted > to program the K3S to ignore the HI-RFI warning for the time being. > Thoughts? > > Chris > KB9SDX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:37:45 +0000 > From: "Thorpe, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I've finally gotten back to working on my morse, practicing with my KX3 with > the KXPD3 attached. At first I thought it was just me, as I am just > relearning this after 30 years of non-use. (Straight-key back in high-school) > > I have the KX3 set for text decode, and speed set to 15wpm. Quite often, it > seems to "hang" for a fraction of a second (variable time, but at times up to > almost a full second). Usually it is with the right paddle (the dah). I can > have the paddle pressed, but I don't get the dah right away - sometimes. > Quite aggravating. I tried bumping the speed up as a test, with the same > problem still occurring. > > I figure this could be a contact problem, but thought I'd ask first before > doing any kind of disassembly, to see if there was some other known issue > (maybe with firmware) first. I have the latest firmware installed. The KXPD3 > is about one year old, and I have just now started using it. > > Jeff - KG7HDZ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:00:06 -0600 > From: Ken G Kopp <[email protected]> > To: Chris L <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: > <cad4cdtm-zb5qstahgbfpfrypnoi0eodyqoe8grqolrf5wej...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Perhaps a coax stub cut for the 49 MHZ frequency and "T'd" off the > connector used by your 6M antenna could provide enough attenuation to > alleviate the problem. > > 73 > > K0PP > I believe the manual states that it takes a watt or two of power at the > antenna connector to set off the HI-RFI warning. Imagine my surprise when I > began seeing the warning on my brand new K3S just days after I'd assembled > it. Almost everyone else who has seen this error has been using a K3 in a > contest environment with multiple transmitters, so I was particularly > stumped as there are no other transmitters in my shack (everything is > boxed) and no active hams in my neighborhood. I did some testing and traced > it to a signal coming in on my 6 meter antenna, which when I disconnected > it caused the HI-RFI warning to go away. Using a VHF capable SDR in > wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal on 49.850 and traced it to... > > A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a > cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the day > and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed this. There > is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my old Icom 706 > shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 without). I spoke with > someone at the house and confirmed that this was the problem by shutting > down the device for an hour. Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law > lives with them and insists on using the baby monitor all day and night. > > I will continue to press for a diplomatic solution (possibly offering to > buy them a newer 800/900MHz unit), but should I fail at that, is this > something I should worry about as far as damaging my K3S? I find it hard to > believe that a baby monitor is pumping out more than 1 watt, so I'm > inclined to believe that the K3S is being a bit overprotective. This plus > the fact that my 6 meter antenna is a PAR Omniangle which is > omnidirectional and according to PAR has no appreciable gain. I'm tempted > to program the K3S to ignore the HI-RFI warning for the time being. > Thoughts? > > Chris > KB9SDX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:20:00 -0500 > From: David Box <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:23:31 -0400 > From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > >> Using a VHF capable SDR in wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal >> on 49.850 and traced it to... > > The SDR should be capable of providing a calibrated (dBm) signal > strength. With that information and the distance from the target > it should be relatively simple to calculate the ERP of the baby > monitor. > > Given that you report the "HI-RFI" indicator is being activated on the > K3S, I would suspect the baby monitor is producing an illegal ERP - > whether it is out of spec accidentally (manufacturing) or has been > tampered with by the owner is not an issue. I would generate a letter > of complaint to the FCC (with calculated ERP data) indicating that you > believe the baby monitor is not in compliance with regulations and must > cease. Send a copy to the owners of the baby monitor a week before > mailing the complaint to the Commission. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > >> I believe the manual states that it takes a watt or two of power at the >> antenna connector to set off the HI-RFI warning. Imagine my surprise when I >> began seeing the warning on my brand new K3S just days after I'd assembled >> it. Almost everyone else who has seen this error has been using a K3 in a >> contest environment with multiple transmitters, so I was particularly >> stumped as there are no other transmitters in my shack (everything is >> boxed) and no active hams in my neighborhood. I did some testing and traced >> it to a signal coming in on my 6 meter antenna, which when I disconnected >> it caused the HI-RFI warning to go away. Using a VHF capable SDR in >> wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal on 49.850 and traced it to... >> >> A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a >> cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the day >> and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed this. There >> is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my old Icom 706 >> shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 without). I spoke with >> someone at the house and confirmed that this was the problem by shutting >> down the device for an hour. Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law >> lives with them and insists on using the baby monitor all day and night. >> >> I will continue to press for a diplomatic solution (possibly offering to >> buy them a newer 800/900MHz unit), but should I fail at that, is this >> something I should worry about as far as damaging my K3S? I find it hard to >> believe that a baby monitor is pumping out more than 1 watt, so I'm >> inclined to believe that the K3S is being a bit overprotective. This plus >> the fact that my 6 meter antenna is a PAR Omniangle which is >> omnidirectional and according to PAR has no appreciable gain. I'm tempted >> to program the K3S to ignore the HI-RFI warning for the time being. >> Thoughts? >> >> Chris >> KB9SDX >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:27:52 -0400 > From: Michael Walker <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: > <ca+33ts45yftrgvj_jpgp+bm4mvpqucbqco0xdh0-hxsgs0x...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I had this problem once. Next time I showed up with a recording of > everything they said over dinner and told them I recordered it over a block > away. > > That got it fixed. > > In another case, with 49Mhz headphones, I just bought them a new 900mhz > pair and gave it to them if they gave me their old ones. Sometimes it is > just cheaper. > > Mike va3mw > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Using a VHF capable SDR in wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal >>> on 49.850 and traced it to... >>> >> >> The SDR should be capable of providing a calibrated (dBm) signal >> strength. With that information and the distance from the target >> it should be relatively simple to calculate the ERP of the baby >> monitor. >> >> Given that you report the "HI-RFI" indicator is being activated on the >> K3S, I would suspect the baby monitor is producing an illegal ERP - >> whether it is out of spec accidentally (manufacturing) or has been >> tampered with by the owner is not an issue. I would generate a letter >> of complaint to the FCC (with calculated ERP data) indicating that you >> believe the baby monitor is not in compliance with regulations and must >> cease. Send a copy to the owners of the baby monitor a week before >> mailing the complaint to the Commission. >> >> 73, >> >> ... Joe, W4TV >> >> >> >> >> I believe the manual states that it takes a watt or two of power at the >>> antenna connector to set off the HI-RFI warning. Imagine my surprise when >>> I >>> began seeing the warning on my brand new K3S just days after I'd assembled >>> it. Almost everyone else who has seen this error has been using a K3 in a >>> contest environment with multiple transmitters, so I was particularly >>> stumped as there are no other transmitters in my shack (everything is >>> boxed) and no active hams in my neighborhood. I did some testing and >>> traced >>> it to a signal coming in on my 6 meter antenna, which when I disconnected >>> it caused the HI-RFI warning to go away. Using a VHF capable SDR in >>> wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal on 49.850 and traced it to... >>> >>> A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a >>> cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the day >>> and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed this. There >>> is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my old Icom 706 >>> shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 without). I spoke with >>> someone at the house and confirmed that this was the problem by shutting >>> down the device for an hour. Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law >>> lives with them and insists on using the baby monitor all day and night. >>> >>> I will continue to press for a diplomatic solution (possibly offering to >>> buy them a newer 800/900MHz unit), but should I fail at that, is this >>> something I should worry about as far as damaging my K3S? I find it hard >>> to >>> believe that a baby monitor is pumping out more than 1 watt, so I'm >>> inclined to believe that the K3S is being a bit overprotective. This plus >>> the fact that my 6 meter antenna is a PAR Omniangle which is >>> omnidirectional and according to PAR has no appreciable gain. I'm tempted >>> to program the K3S to ignore the HI-RFI warning for the time being. >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Chris >>> KB9SDX >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[email protected] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:44:13 -0700 > From: Jim Brown <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > On Fri,6/17/2016 8:00 AM, Ken G Kopp wrote: >> Perhaps a coax stub cut for the 49 MHZ frequency and "T'd" off the >> connector used by your 6M antenna could provide enough attenuation to >> alleviate the problem. > > Stubs are not nearly narrow enough to solve this problem. The unit in > question is in clear violation of FCC Rules if it interferes with > licensed communications, including yours. If it's putting out that much > signal, it's clearly in excess of FCC Rules, probably wildly so. > > A year or two ago, I bought a low power FM TX on amazon that I hoped to > use to feed an internet radio RX around my rural home and yard. I > quickly rejected it -- it produced a ton of RF trash up and down the > band and lots of audible distortion on its TX frequency. As I recall, it > was advertised as 1W, and I had a 20 dB pad on the antenna. For at least > five years, I've used a legal "trucker's" FM modulator that is in the > 10mW range; my goal was to get about 6dB more field strength, and a > cleaner signal. > > W4TV has given you good advice on the route through the FCC, but buying > them a decent unit may be the more practical solution. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:05:19 +0200 > From: Helmut Berka <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S "HI-RFI" warning a bit too sensitive? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Hi Chris, > > Did you tell her / them how dangerous high power RF is and how negative > it affects a baby? > > > vy 73 de > > Helmut DL2MAJ > > > > Am 17/06/16 um 13:30 schrieb Chris L: >> I believe the manual states that it takes a watt or two of power at the >> antenna connector to set off the HI-RFI warning. Imagine my surprise when I >> began seeing the warning on my brand new K3S just days after I'd assembled >> it. Almost everyone else who has seen this error has been using a K3 in a >> contest environment with multiple transmitters, so I was particularly >> stumped as there are no other transmitters in my shack (everything is >> boxed) and no active hams in my neighborhood. I did some testing and traced >> it to a signal coming in on my 6 meter antenna, which when I disconnected >> it caused the HI-RFI warning to go away. Using a VHF capable SDR in >> wideband mode, I found a strong FM signal on 49.850 and traced it to... >> >> A baby monitor. Yep, not one block from my house lives a couple with a >> cheap 49MHz baby monitor blasting away on 49.850MHz all hours of the day >> and night. A short "fox hunt" with a service monitor confirmed this. There >> is 100KHz worth of splatter coming from this thing and my old Icom 706 >> shows it as S9 with the attenuator on (and S9 +60 without). I spoke with >> someone at the house and confirmed that this was the problem by shutting >> down the device for an hour. Unfortunately, the couple's mother-in-law >> lives with them and insists on using the baby monitor all day and night. >> >> I will continue to press for a diplomatic solution (possibly offering to >> buy them a newer 800/900MHz unit), but should I fail at that, is this >> something I should worry about as far as damaging my K3S? I find it hard to >> believe that a baby monitor is pumping out more than 1 watt, so I'm >> inclined to believe that the K3S is being a bit overprotective. This plus >> the fact that my 6 meter antenna is a PAR Omniangle which is >> omnidirectional and according to PAR has no appreciable gain. I'm tempted >> to program the K3S to ignore the HI-RFI warning for the time being. >> Thoughts? >> >> Chris >> KB9SDX >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:05:20 +0000 > From: Alan Price <[email protected]> > To: elecraft <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Let me build your K2 > Message-ID: > > <co2pr01mb2102aacb6b7f97210fe33365ee...@co2pr01mb2102.prod.exchangelabs.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > You have a new K2 (or any other Elecraft kit) with the options you want. My > prices are reasonable. > > > 73 > > Alan > > W1HYV > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:09:52 -0700 > From: James Bennett <[email protected]> > To: Elecraft Reflector Reflector <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 / FLDIGI Question > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > For those interested?.. > > Got a suggestion from Ron, W7HD that the rig has to have VOX turned off. I > had mine turned on. Turned it off and no longer have the TX hang problem. > Yippee!! > > >> On Wednesday, Jun 15, 2016, at Wednesday, 12:05 PM, James Bennett >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Got a strange thing happening with my KX3 when I am running FLDIGI, and it >> just started happening in the past few days. FLDIGI is version 3.22.01. >> >> If I place FLDIGI into transmit mode the KX3 follows and whatever I type is >> transmitted - cool. However, when I tell FLDIGI to stop transmitting and go >> back to receive, FLDIGI quits sending audio as it has been instructed and >> ?appears? to go back to receive mode, but the KX3 TX light stays on and I >> have to press the XMIT button to make it go receive. Not cool. >> >> Furthermore, if I am using WSJT-X, T/R works fine. >> >> Running the KX3 in CW mode works fine - I press and release the key, the rig >> transmits and then goes back to receive. This obviously has something to do >> with FLDIGI. But I?m starting here with the Elecraft group in hopes someone >> has a suggestion. >> >> Any idea what I need to change to make the KX3 obey the FLDIGI command to >> return to receive mode? >> >> Thanks, Jim / W6JHB >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:14:27 -0300 > From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <[email protected]> > To: James Bennett <[email protected]> > Cc: Elecraft Reflector Reflector <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 / FLDIGI Question > Message-ID: > <CA+h_a7JSURX+NJyUSTbmgCjiES03637G81TfROMNZ=zyotq...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > wait for coming version of SWISSLOG software http://www.informatix.li/ , > will have important support for FLDIGI, MultiPsk, Cw Skimmer and OmniRig > > 73, > Jorge > CX6VM/CW5W > > > > 2016-06-17 13:09 GMT-03:00 James Bennett <[email protected]>: > >> For those interested?.. >> >> Got a suggestion from Ron, W7HD that the rig has to have VOX turned off. I >> had mine turned on. Turned it off and no longer have the TX hang problem. >> Yippee!! >> >> >> > On Wednesday, Jun 15, 2016, at Wednesday, 12:05 PM, James Bennett < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Got a strange thing happening with my KX3 when I am running FLDIGI, and >> it just started happening in the past few days. FLDIGI is version 3.22.01. >> > >> > If I place FLDIGI into transmit mode the KX3 follows and whatever I type >> is transmitted - cool. However, when I tell FLDIGI to stop transmitting and >> go back to receive, FLDIGI quits sending audio as it has been instructed >> and ?appears? to go back to receive mode, but the KX3 TX light stays on and >> I have to press the XMIT button to make it go receive. Not cool. >> > >> > Furthermore, if I am using WSJT-X, T/R works fine. >> > >> > Running the KX3 in CW mode works fine - I press and release the key, the >> rig transmits and then goes back to receive. This obviously has something >> to do with FLDIGI. But I?m starting here with the Elecraft group in hopes >> someone has a suggestion. >> > >> > Any idea what I need to change to make the KX3 obey the FLDIGI command >> to return to receive mode? >> > >> > Thanks, Jim / W6JHB >> > ______________________________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> > Post: mailto:[email protected] >> > >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > Message delivered to [email protected] >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] > > > > > -- > 73, > Jorge > CX6VM/CW5W > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:04:42 +0000 (UTC) > From: thomas branton <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Thomas > Branton <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] K3/100 for sale > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I have my? K3/100 (serial number 61--) with KAT3; KXV3A; KBPF3; KFLA-400; > KFLA-1.8; KFLA-2.8; KFLA-6; and KSYN3A for sale. It has been my backup rig > and has seen little use. It has all the updates and has the new KSYN3A board > installed. It is in mint shape and never seen cigarette smoke. I want > $2300.00 plus shipping continental USA from 75964. E-mail me > if interested. Thanks,?Tom KF5WBS? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:22:58 -0700 > From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <[email protected]> > To: Elecraft Reflector Reflector <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] KX2 Shipping Status > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Current KX2 shipping Status: > Ordered through 5/27: Ships 6/17-6/21 > Ordered 5/28-29: Ships 6/21-6/22 > Ordered 5/30-6/1: Ships 6/22-6/23 > Ordered 6/2-6/3: Ships 6/23-24 > Ordered 6/4-6/5: Ships 6/24-27 > > For the latest KX2 shipping status, the best place to go is our shipping > status > page at: > http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_shipping_status.htm > > Please note that due to the overwhelming success of the KX2, we are receiving > a > huge number of emails and calls each day. If possible, please resist the urge > to > email for status and read our status page. That will help us focus on > processing > new orders for shipment quickly :-) > > For fastest response to shipping issues, please email [email protected] > directly, or call us at 831-763-4211 (add +1 in Eu). For tech support use > [email protected] (k3support@..., kx3support@... and support@... all go to > the [email protected] mailbox, which is read by all of our support > engineers.) > > On emails we may be delayed a business day in replying. (We also have a large > email load on Mondays from the accumulated weekend emails.) Also remember that > we are time shifted a day from Eu. > > 73, > Eric > /elecraft.com/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:36:36 -0400 > From: Peter Pauly <[email protected]> > To: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <[email protected]> > Cc: Elecraft Reflector Reflector <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Shipping Status > Message-ID: > <cakxfwbtug4_t-zcs3tokfl8h01o5erv8yo6qebo91mspnp-...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I ordered a KXPA100 amp four days ago and the status was in stock. It > hasn't shipped yet and I'm hoping to get it before Field Day, but I am > assuming that the popularity of the KX2 is indirectly affecting all of the > product lines. If I lived in CA, I would offer to come over and help. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Current KX2 shipping Status: >> Ordered through 5/27: Ships 6/17-6/21 >> Ordered 5/28-29: Ships 6/21-6/22 >> Ordered 5/30-6/1: Ships 6/22-6/23 >> Ordered 6/2-6/3: Ships 6/23-24 >> Ordered 6/4-6/5: Ships 6/24-27 >> >> For the latest KX2 shipping status, the best place to go is our shipping >> status page at: >> http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_shipping_status.htm >> >> Please note that due to the overwhelming success of the KX2, we are >> receiving a huge number of emails and calls each day. If possible, please >> resist the urge to email for status and read our status page. That will >> help us focus on processing new orders for shipment quickly :-) >> >> For fastest response to shipping issues, please email [email protected] >> directly, or call us at 831-763-4211 (add +1 in Eu). For tech support >> use [email protected] (k3support@..., kx3support@... and support@... >> all go to the [email protected] mailbox, which is read by all of our >> support engineers.) >> >> On emails we may be delayed a business day in replying. (We also have a >> large email load on Mondays from the accumulated weekend emails.) Also >> remember that we are time shifted a day from Eu. >> >> 73, >> Eric >> /elecraft.com/ >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:58:02 -0700 > From: Wayne Burdick <[email protected]> > To: Tom Crayner <[email protected]> > Cc: david perry <[email protected]>, elecraft > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 real life power > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > The KX2 will put out a full 10 watts on most bands when running from 11-14 V. > In real life :) > > The internal battery, when fully charged, starts out at 12 V but quickly > settles to around 11 V. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:37 AM, Tom Crayner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds like the batteries are possibly suspect. >> >> A KX3 will give out 10W down to 10V according to the firmware release >> (v2.38), and although I haven't personally run my batteries down that low I >> haven't seen any behavior to indicate otherwise (in other words I'm getting >> 10W out, not 3 or 4W as you are seeing). Check and see if you are on that >> FW release. >> >> On the KX2 I am set at 5W out (not the full 10W due to duty cycle of the >> digital I use) and I am still getting the full 5W out with the battery pack >> about half depleted (if I believe the amp hours reading). >> >> Tom, W2YF >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:45 AM, david perry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Im wondering what KX2 users are finding to be the output power when on >>> internal battery. I ask because I am using a friends KX3 at the moment and >>> whilst on external power it gives full spec, on internals the power drops >>> to 3 or 4 watts out. Is the KX2 better than this or is that all there is, >>> even on the new rig? >>> >>> David >>> G4YVM >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[email protected] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> Message delivered to [email protected] >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:09:48 -0700 > From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[email protected]> > To: "'Dennis L. Haarsager'" <[email protected]>, > "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KXPD3 thumb screw > Message-ID: <002f01d1c8c3$700ad0f0$502072d0$@biz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Doing some testing with only the KXPD3 paddles available, I just left the > longer screw out. One screw holds the paddles securely in place. > > 73, Ron AC7AC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Elecraft [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis > L. Haarsager > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 6:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Elecraft] KXPD3 thumb screw > > Got my KX2 today, SN 314. Pretty sweet! But, unfortunately, the KXPD2 is > back ordered. I already have a KXPD3 with the older "pointy" thumb screw. > Has anyone had luck just grinding the point down? > > 73, Dennis, N7DH/1 > > -- > Mail: PO Box 192, Kittery Point, ME 03905-0192 > +1 207-703-2472 (home) > +1 202-431-1556 (mobile) > +1 866-587-3403 (fax) > <http://technology360.com> <http://haarsager.org> <http://stadsbygd.info> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message > delivered to [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:11:45 -0700 > From: Walter Underwood <[email protected]> > To: Peter Pauly <[email protected]>, Elecraft Reflector Reflector > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Shipping Status > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I ordered a KXPA100 kit on 6/2 and it was shipped on 6/8. That was after the > KX2 announcement. > > I would expect that a fair number of people are ordering a KXPA100 with their > KX2. > > wunder > K6WRU > Walter Underwood > CM87wj > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> On Jun 17, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Peter Pauly <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I ordered a KXPA100 amp four days ago and the status was in stock. It >> hasn't shipped yet and I'm hoping to get it before Field Day, but I am >> assuming that the popularity of the KX2 is indirectly affecting all of the >> product lines. If I lived in CA, I would offer to come over and help. >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Current KX2 shipping Status: >>> Ordered through 5/27: Ships 6/17-6/21 >>> Ordered 5/28-29: Ships 6/21-6/22 >>> Ordered 5/30-6/1: Ships 6/22-6/23 >>> Ordered 6/2-6/3: Ships 6/23-24 >>> Ordered 6/4-6/5: Ships 6/24-27 >>> >>> For the latest KX2 shipping status, the best place to go is our shipping >>> status page at: >>> http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_shipping_status.htm >>> >>> Please note that due to the overwhelming success of the KX2, we are >>> receiving a huge number of emails and calls each day. If possible, please >>> resist the urge to email for status and read our status page. That will >>> help us focus on processing new orders for shipment quickly :-) >>> >>> For fastest response to shipping issues, please email [email protected] >>> directly, or call us at 831-763-4211 (add +1 in Eu). For tech support >>> use [email protected] (k3support@..., kx3support@... and support@... >>> all go to the [email protected] mailbox, which is read by all of our >>> support engineers.) >>> >>> On emails we may be delayed a business day in replying. (We also have a >>> large email load on Mondays from the accumulated weekend emails.) Also >>> remember that we are time shifted a day from Eu. >>> >>> 73, >>> Eric >>> /elecraft.com/ >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[email protected] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> Message delivered to [email protected] >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:37:04 -0500 > From: Randy Farmer <[email protected]> > To: elecraft <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] K-Pod modification for K3S > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > As it happens, I will soon have my K3s under the knife to replace a > faulty PA module. It occurred to me that this would also be a good > opportunity to perform the internal modification to power the K-Pod via > the data cable. The web page says information on the modification "will > be posted here before product ship", but so far I haven't seen it. Has > anyone seen this information, and if so, could you please post a link to it? > > 73... > Randy, W8FN > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 21 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:25:53 +0000 > From: "Thorpe, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 / KXPD3 "hanging"? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Got a few responses. Turns out it was the grounding problem. Did the mod with > some thin speaker wire and works well now. > > Jeff - KG7HDZ > >> On Jun 17, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Thorpe, Jeffrey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've finally gotten back to working on my morse, practicing with my KX3 with >> the KXPD3 attached. At first I thought it was just me, as I am just >> relearning this after 30 years of non-use. (Straight-key back in high-school) >> >> I have the KX3 set for text decode, and speed set to 15wpm. Quite often, it >> seems to "hang" for a fraction of a second (variable time, but at times up >> to almost a full second). Usually it is with the right paddle (the dah). I >> can have the paddle pressed, but I don't get the dah right away - sometimes. >> Quite aggravating. I tried bumping the speed up as a test, with the same >> problem still occurring. >> >> I figure this could be a contact problem, but thought I'd ask first before >> doing any kind of disassembly, to see if there was some other known issue >> (maybe with firmware) first. I have the latest firmware installed. The KXPD3 >> is about one year old, and I have just now started using it. >> >> Jeff - KG7HDZ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 22 > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 00:10:03 +0000 > From: "Mike VE3YF" <[email protected]> > To: "" <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I am thinking of getting a 2nd DCHF Coupler for my P3 TX Monitor Setup. This > way I could Monitor 2 Outputs from the same P3. Currently I have a coupler > right after my main linear via Ant 1 on the K3, but want to add a second > coupler to the output of the KPA500 via Ant 2 on the K3. I then could switch > between the outputs and use the same P3. I realize I can only use 1 coupler > at a time, but changing cables etc out all the time would be a pain. Does > anyone know of a switch that could handle this job. I have done a search on > the internet and eBay and found nothing that would mate up to a RJ8 Connector > which the TX Monitor and Couplers use. If any one is doing what I am > contemplating I would like to hear from you. Tnx. > > 73 De Mike > VE3YF > > http://www.ve3yf.com > [http://www.ve3yf.com/] > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 23 > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:30:00 -0700 > From: Alan Bloom <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > > I am thinking of getting a 2nd DCHF Coupler for my P3 TX Monitor > > Setup. This way I could Monitor 2 Outputs from the same P3. ... > > Does anyone know of a switch that could handle this job. > > Here's the one I use. It allows switching up to four 8P8C (RJ-45) > connectors. $10 from Amazon: > > https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AUB3SSA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 > > Alan N1AL > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 24 > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 01:18:54 -0700 > From: "Erik Basilier" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 S-meter segment stuck > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi All, > > > > Today I have the S-5 segment stuck on my KX3 display. That is also the SWR 2 > segment. What I mean is the segment is black with no receive signal, while > the segments to the left of it are not black, and there is no transmission > going on. Reloading the firmware didn't help. Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > Erik K7TV > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 25 > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:47:01 +0200 > From: Erlend Grimseid <[email protected]> > To: Erik Basilier <[email protected]> > Cc: Elecraft List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 S-meter segment stuck > Message-ID: > <CABOvax_9bqSkdYPNZMjvX8gZf9oSHbe1jXBz5hN=c=0n4zv...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Might it be the RF gain setting? > > 73 > LA4TTA > Erlend > > 2016-06-18 10:18 GMT+02:00 Erik Basilier <[email protected]>: > >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> Today I have the S-5 segment stuck on my KX3 display. That is also the SWR >> 2 >> segment. What I mean is the segment is black with no receive signal, while >> the segments to the left of it are not black, and there is no transmission >> going on. Reloading the firmware didn't help. Any ideas? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Erik K7TV >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 26 > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 09:36:02 +0000 > From: "Mike VE3YF" <[email protected]> > To: "" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3/TX Mon Coupler Switching Idea > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Alan: > > Tnx for the info, good to see someone else has done it. Question though, does > the Coupler cable use RJ45 connectors, reason I ask I see on the Elecraft > site it says RJ8, and I am not finding too much info on the Internet ref RJ8 > Connectors. Perhaps I am reading too much into it. > > > > 73 De Mike > VE3YF > > http://www.ve3yf.com > [http://www.ve3yf.com/] > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [email protected] > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > You must be a subscriber to post. > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > ------------------------------ > > End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 146, Issue 24 > ***************************************** ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
