Heathkit was at the forefront of the personal computer revolution.  Their H-8 
was one of the earliest 8-bit computers, and the H-89 one of the first Z-80 
machines, as well as being the first “all in one” computer that combined the 
keyboard, monitor, and processor into a single enclosure.  I used an H-89 as a 
word processor for a number of years, upgrading it with aftermarket products 
(which were plentiful) to the first-ever silicon drive, in lieu of a 5 inch 
floppy. It didn’t have “permanent” memory, so you had to copy files a a floppy 
before shutting down, but it sure accelerated the word processing speed.  The 
Z-80 (an enhanced 8080 chip made by Zilog) addressed 64K of memory, and the 
operating system (CP/M) used about 39K, which didn’t leave much space for the 
word processing app and the document file.  There was a lot of swapping of 
chunks of instruction in and out of memory.  

They didn’t keep up with the advances in technology forever, but I think that 
was due more to a lack of capital than a lack of focus. Their 16-bit machines 
never caught on in the face of the IBM PC onslaught.

Lew N6LEW



> On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dauer, Edward <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It may be that Heath’s demise came less from a lack of entrepreneurship than 
> from a lack of focus on the market where it had mastered its route to 
> success.  The introduction of personal computers at around the same time 
> probably played a role as well. 

Lew Phelps N6LEW
Pasadena, CA DM04wd
Elecraft K3-10 / KXV144 / XV432
Yaesu FT-7800 
[email protected]
www.n6lew.us

Generalized Law of Entropy: Sooner or later, everything that has been put 
together will fall apart.





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to