You can not do FSK RTTY with the single USB cable - period, end of story. You also lose the benefits of the K1EL WinKey keyer - the K3 keyer may be one of the better ones around but it is not supported by most logging software and even Windows 10 is prone to stuttering when generating CW.
73, ... Joe, W4TV On 11/23/2016 10:59 PM, Peter Dougherty wrote:
Hi all, Thanks to my recent troubles reconfiguring my K3s for USB CW operation has given me pause and I was wondering if it's possible to use just a USB cable for all PC<>K3s interactions. I do CW, SSB (live and .wav files), FSK-RTTY, a little PSK when needed and a very little JT-65 on occasion. When I use RTTY, I also like to do dual-channel receive for pileups. While the MK-II is a great device, it does increase the complexity of my station somewhat dramatically and I'm wondering if it's possible or feasible to do everything just via the USB cable. I'm trying to reduce the complexity of my setup if at all possible. Should I be pursuing this strategy or does the MK-II and its inherent complexity offer any significant advantages? Thanks in advance. --------------------------------------------- 73 and Good DX Peter, W2IRT Vice President, North Jersey DX Association DXCC Card Checker Letter O Manager, ARRL Incoming 2nd District QSL bureau ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
