There are several factors that make this technique insufficient to "measure" 
your ears.  

The K3 splits the incoming signal path and sends part of the signal to the P3 
and part to the K3 receive circuitry.  The split occurs just after the first 
mixer so the P3 is sampling a wideband signal (+/- 200 KHz) centered at the 9 
MHz IF.  

The K3 passes the same signal through the narrowband IF filters, amplifies the 
signals and down-converts to 15 KHz, amplifies again, and then uses a TI DSP 
for filtering, Noise Reduction and detection.

The P3 is an SDR directly operating on the wideband 9 MHz IF input signal.  It 
immediately converts the signal using a different A/D converter, a digital down 
converter and digital filters, and a Microchip DSP.  

These two signal paths are dramatically different!  They each have their own 
imperfections including noise, several kinds of distortion, and differences in 
digital processing algorithms.  Just because you can see a signal on the P3, it 
doesn't mean you can hear it through the K3.  And the reverse is also be 
true--just because you hear it on the K3, it doesn't mean that you can see it 
on the P3.  There are just too many variables.

The P3 does indeed have an extremely narrow bandwidth--only one pixel wide or 
roughly SPAN/450.  But, this is after a signal is processed with amplifiers, an 
A/D converter, a digital mixer and decimation filters, and then converted to a 
spectrum display with an FFT (with some NR).  All of these processes, whether 
analog or digital, slightly degrade the S/N ratio of the signal.  

The K3 uses a very modern approach to maximize dynamic range in the signal 
path.  While it is low noise, it is also highly immune to distortion.  The K3 
has a wide variety of selectable signal processing techniques that are not in 
the P3, including two Noise Reduction systems, Noise Blanking, AFX, EQ, Notch, 
and both narrowband analog and digital filtering.  You can set up the K3 signal 
path to operate in many different ways--and these various set-ups will affect 
noise floor and dynamic range.

There is no guarantee that these two paths maintain the same noise floor and 
the same distortion characteristics.  Sorry, but you can't use your P3's 
display to measure your ears.  But, that doesn't mean that some excellent 
operators can read CW signals seemingly buried in noise.  K0KX comes to mind.

John
K0UM
 


------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 05:43:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Al Lorona <[email protected]>
To: Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]>
Subject: [Elecraft] [P3] Ability to copy very weak signals
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


How are your 'ears'-- your ability to copy very weak CW signals?

Here's a way to "measure" your ears. You'll need your panadapter set to a 
narrow span such as 2 kHz. Turn on averaging so that the noise flattens out to 
allow you to estimate the true level of the noise. Use a full-screen vertical 
scale of just a few dB to make it easy to measure small signals just above the 
noise. 

Whatever your noise floor is, when a signal creates a 3 dB "bump" above the 
noise floor, that means the signal and noise are equal (because if you add two 
equal powers you get twice the power, which is a 3 dB bump). We call this 
condition a "signal-to-noise ratio of 0 dB".

Now tune around the band to find very weak signals and see how much of a bump 
they make. Here are some rough rules of thumb, rounded off for simplicity:

Height of bump above noise        S/N ratio

6 dB                                 5 dB
5                                    3 dB
4 dB                                                        2 dB
3.5 dB                               1 dB
3 dB                                                        0 dB
2.5 dB                                                 -1 dB
2 dB                                                     -2 dB
1.8 dB                                                 -3 dB


I listed some negative S/N ratios because I've heard of folks who can copy 
signals below the noise floor! That's crazy!

In any case, this is a very approximate measurement, but it's fun having some 
idea how well you can actually copy CW at phenomenally low levels.



Al  W6LX

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to