Right. Duh!!!

Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill


> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Don Wilhelm <donw...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Bill,
> 
> I think there is a big "NOT" missing from your post.
> How could Elecraft control and provide support for code of each user's 
> 'invention'.
> Elecraft support has enough problems with support for the major OS platforms 
> and users who have trouble using those OS platforms - for instance needing 
> Elecraft support to help them with downloading and installing the Utility 
> programs and help in downloading firmware.  Yes, it happens.
> 
> With open source, it would be chaotic for users who are not "computer smart" 
> and not conversant with computer lingo.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
>> On 12/16/2016 4:33 PM, Nr4c wrote:
>> If it were "open source" Elecraft could control what you did to your radio.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> ...nr4c. bill
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Doug Person <d...@k0dxv.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm a big Pi fan myself.  So if adding my voice provides any additional 
>>> influence - here it is.  I'm also a programmer and I agree there is extra 
>>> work involved.  If the utility was open source, then volunteers could join 
>>> in and manage the tool chain and build. I would certainly be happy to make 
>>> a contribution.
>>> 
>>> The Raspberry Pi is a very hot platform that gets more and more capable 
>>> with each new board.  Version 3 is quite amazing.  I can hardly tell I'm 
>>> running on a little ARM box.  It's power is the result of the advances in 
>>> mobile platforms, so the future for these little computers is very bright.
>>> 
>>> Doug -- K0DXV
>>> 
>>>> On 12/13/2016 8:28 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>>>> Ah, crud - you know, I saw that "x86-based Linux” statement and it never 
>>>> dawned on me about the Pi being ARM-based!!! I should have known that, as 
>>>> I went through a ton of hoops getting WSJT-X and Hamlib running on the RPi 
>>>> because of that issue. In both instances I had to compile from source. 
>>>> Once the dependencies were addressed, the compilation process went well, 
>>>> although sloooooow. Well, I suppose Elecraft doesn’t provide source for 
>>>> the utility, so I guess I’ve got to pull the cable off the RPi and over to 
>>>> my iMac and run the Utility over there on OSX. Not cool, dang it. Oh well…
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for everyone’s input.
>>>> 
>>>> 73 and Happy Holidays, Jim / W6JHB
>>>> Folsom, CA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On   Tuesday, Dec 13, 2016, at  Tuesday, 6:16 PM, Tim Elwell 
>>>>> <kg1...@gmail.com> wroteBill,
> 
> I think there is a big "NOT" missing from your post.
> How could Elecraft control and provide support for code of each user's 
> 'invention'.
> Elecraft support has enough problems with support for the major OS platforms 
> and users who have trouble using those OS platforms - for instance needing 
> Elecraft support to help them with downloading and installing the Utility 
> programs and help in downloading firmware.  Yes, it happens.
> 
> With open source, it would be chaotic for users who are not "computer smart" 
> and not conversant with computer lingo.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
>> On 12/16/2016 4:33 PM, Nr4c wrote:
>> If it were "open source" Elecraft could control what you did to your radio.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> ...nr4c. bill
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Doug Person <d...@k0dxv.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm a big Pi fan myself.  So if adding my voice provides any additional 
>>> influence - here it is.  I'm also a programmer and I agree there is extra 
>>> work involved.  If the utility was open source, then volunteers could join 
>>> in and manage the tool chain and build. I would certainly be happy to make 
>>> a contribution.
>>> 
>>> The Raspberry Pi is a very hot platform that gets more and more capable 
>>> with each new board.  Version 3 is quite amazing.  I can hardly tell I'm 
>>> running on a little ARM box.  It's power is the result of the advances in 
>>> mobile platforms, so the future for these little computers is very bright.
>>> 
>>> Doug -- K0DXV
>>> 
>>>> On 12/13/2016 8:28 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>>>> Ah, crud - you know, I saw that "x86-based Linux” statement and it never 
>>>> dawned on me about the Pi being ARM-based!!! I should have known that, as 
>>>> I went through a ton of hoops getting WSJT-X and Hamlib running on the RPi 
>>>> because of that issue. In both instances I had to compile from source. 
>>>> Once the dependencies were addressed, the compilation process went well, 
>>>> although sloooooow. Well, I suppose Elecraft doesn’t provide source for 
>>>> the utility, so I guess I’ve got to pull the cable off the RPi and over to 
>>>> my iMac and run the Utility over there on OSX. Not cool, dang it. Oh well…
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for everyone’s input.
>>>> 
>>>> 73 and Happy Holidays, Jim / W6JHB
>>>> Folsom, CA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On   Tuesday, Dec 13, 2016, at  Tuesday, 6:16 PM, Tim Elwell 
>>>>> <kg1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The utility is compiled for the x86 architecture. You won't be able to 
>>>>> run it on the ARM architecture that the Pi runs on. The only way to do 
>>>>> that is for Elecraft to compile a version for the ARM. Last I seem to 
>>>>> recall being mentioned, there wasn't enough need to spend the time 
>>>>> setting up the tool chain and dependencies for the ARM platform. It would 
>>>>> be time best spent fixing other problems.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm a Pi person myself and would like to see it for that platform, but do 
>>>>> understand as a programmer the difficulties of the extra support required 
>>>>> for another platform. And a small company has to watch their employee 
>>>>> capital.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here's hoping for the future, though.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> KG1GEM
>>>>> 
>>>>> PS: Sorry Jim, I realized I mistakenly replied directly to you and not 
>>>>> the list originally.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/13/16 7:53 PM, I'm a big Pi fan myself.  So if adding my voice 
>>>>> provides any additional
>>> influence - here it is.  I'm also a programmer and I agree there is extra 
>>> work involved.  If the utility was open source, then volunteers could join 
>>> in and manage the tool chain and build. I would certainly be happy to make 
>>> a contribution.
>>> 
>>> The Raspberry Pi is a very hot platform that gets more and more capable 
>>> with each new board.  Version 3 is quite amazing.  I can hardly tell I'm 
>>> running on a little ARM box.  It's power is the result of the advances in 
>>> mobile platforms, so the future for these little computers is very bright.
>>> 
>>> Doug -- K0DXV
>>> 
>>>> On 12/13/2016 8:28 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>>>> Ah, crud - you know, I saw that "x86-based Linux” statement and it never 
>>>> dawned on me about the Pi being ARM-based!!! I should have known that, as 
>>>> I went through a ton of hoops getting WSJT-X and Hamlib running on the RPi 
>>>> because of that issue. In both instances I had to compile from source. 
>>>> Once the dependencies were addressed, the compilation process went well, 
>>>> although sloooooow. Well, I suppose Elecraft doesn’t provide source for 
>>>> the utility, so I guess I’ve got to pull the cable off the RPi and over to 
>>>> my iMac and run the Utility over there on OSX. Not cool, dang it. Oh well…
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for everyone’s input.
>>>> 
>>>> 73 and Happy Holidays, Jim / W6JHB
>>>> Folsom, CA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On   Tuesday, Dec 13, 2016, at  Tuesday, 6:16 PM, Tim Elwell 
>>>>> <kg1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The utility is compiled for the x86 architecture. You won't be able to 
>>>>> run it on the ARM architecture that the Pi runs on. The only way to do 
>>>>> that is for Elecraft to compile a version for the ARM. Last I seem to 
>>>>> recall being mentioned, there wasn't enough need to spend the time 
>>>>> setting up the tool chain and dependencies for the ARM platform. It would 
>>>>> be time best spent fixing other problems.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm a Pi person myself and would like to see it for that platform, but do 
>>>>> understand as a programmer the difficulties of the extra support required 
>>>>> for another platform. And a small company has to watch their employee 
>>>>> capital.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here's hoping for the future, though.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> KG1GEM
>>>>> 
>>>>> PS: Sorry Jim, I realized I mistakenly replied directly to you and not 
>>>>> the list originally.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 12/13/16 7:53 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>>>>>> I’ve been using my KX3 connected to a Raspberry Pi 3 for quite some 
>>>>>> time, using CQRlog for logging, FLDIGI for PSK31, and recently, WXJT-X 
>>>>>> rc3 for JT9 and JT65. I’d like to load the most current firmware into 
>>>>>> the KX3 so I can get the full 15 watts out. I downloaded and un-tar’d 
>>>>>> the KX3 Utility from the Elecraft web site. So - now what? If I click on 
>>>>>> the “kx3util” executable, nothing happens. What is the secret procedure 
>>>>>> to get this going? I am using the Raspian Jessie (Debian Linux) OS on 
>>>>>> this RPi.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>> Message delivered to w6...@me.com
>>>> James Bennett
>>>> w6...@me.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>> 
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to n...@widomaker.com
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com
>> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to n...@widomaker.com

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to