I guess if every menu item had an applicable CAT command, it could be feasible. 
But I don’t think they all do, do they?
-Kevin (KK4YEL)

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of 
electrons were terribly inconvenienced !

On Sep 27, 2017, at 07:52, brian 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Byron,

Absolutely not.  Functionality of KPOD is way too limited.

I think what he is envisioning is something like an optional detachable or 
attachable face plate (like the TS480) has.  It may be huge in size and for 
example might have individual band buttons, lots of knobs for other functions 
and maybe single function push button instead to press/tap multifunction 
buttons.  Maybe most of the buttons could be customized.

Such an offering could satisfy both worlds.  One world doesn't think they need 
any hardware interface and wants to run everything by computer.  The second 
world prefers a more traditional knob/button interface. Keep in mind the 
demographics.  Closely spaced small buttons and knobs are difficult for many 
older people to use.  Reading the small captions is also an issue.

The design of such a detachable interface that satisfies most would be a 
challenge.  It may be that there needs to be several different sized offerings. 
 Market size may be a real issue.

In either case, there would be no escape from some menus.  There is simply too 
much functionality to put everything on a hardware interface.

Keep in mind the FLEX history.  It started out as all computer control. Then 
they developed the Maestro hardware interface because many found the all 
computer interface lacking.

73 de Brian/K3KO

On 9/27/2017 1:08 AM, Byron Servies wrote:
Hi there!

Isn't this the niche the K-Pod was supposed to fill?  Fully
programmable external control with additional outputs for station
control?

73, Byron N6NUL
(sorry for the dup, Emory)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Emory Schley 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Ron, AC7AC, wrote, under another subject heading: "I'm not bothered by choosing 
between a dozen switches but sorting through half a dozen menu items to change 
one gives me a headache."

That pretty much sums up my attitude as well, and I've heard other hams– MANY 
other hams–  complain about menus, but I don't recall ever hearing anyone 
complain about excess knobs, buttons, dials, etc. Reading Ron's thoughts made 
me wonder out loud, why can't Elecraft or some third party make a "magic box" 
that would be completely impotent by itself, but with the capability to mate up 
to one of these small miniaturized wonders like the KX2 or KX3, and which would 
contain oodles of manual controls for virtually every function the parent rig 
is capable of providing?

This would NOT impact the normal functioning of the parent rig, but would act 
as an accessory for those who eschew menus and such, and who like their rigs 
bigger, bulkier and in more traditional formats. I envision a box of switches, 
buttons, knobs, perhaps even gauges that would be cable-fed (or wi-fied) from 
the little parent rig sitting behind the magic box. Its size would be whatever 
was necessary to accommodate the design and would resemble a normal-sized base 
station. You could conceivably have a separate control for each function the 
parent rig provides, or if logic dictated, then several controls might be 
multi-purpose.

Then an op could have the best of both worlds. He/she could use his/her KX2/KX3 
as a portable rig in the normal way, but when returned to the home station, it 
could be plugged back into the magic box to power it in a more expansive and 
convenient manner.

Elecraft seems to always be on the lookout for new products. Here's one they 
might be able to put on the market, up and running, quickly because most of the 
engineering has already been worked out for the parent rig.

Emory Schley
N4LP
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to