Yard house is fine

> On Nov 9, 2017, at 10:12 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Edward R Cole)
>   2. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Doug Person)
>   3. Re: Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500 (Joe Subich, W4TV)
>   4. Re: Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500 (Jorge Diez - CX6VM)
>   5. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Walter Underwood)
>   6. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Bill Johnson)
>   7. Re: K3 / K3s Filters Available - Update (Doug Hensley)
>   8. K2 S/N.7723 Lives :) (Martin Sole)
>   9. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Ron D'Eau Claire)
>  10. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Graziano Roccon)
>  11. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Charlie T)
>  12. kxpd3 question (JEROME SODUS)
>  13. Re: kxpd3 question (Clay Autery)
>  14. Re: kxpd3 question (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP)
>  15. Re: kxpd3 question (rich hurd WC3T)
>  16. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Charlie T)
>  17. Re: kxpd3 question ([email protected])
>  18. Re: kxpd3 question (Gary Smith)
>  19. Re: kxpd3 question (Dave Sublette)
>  20. Re: kxpd3 question (Mark Petiford)
>  21. Re: kxpd3 question (Ron D'Eau Claire)
> 
> 
> Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Edward R Cole)
>   2. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Doug Person)
>   3. Re: Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500 (Joe Subich, W4TV)
>   4. Re: Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500 (Jorge Diez - CX6VM)
>   5. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Walter Underwood)
>   6. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Bill Johnson)
>   7. Re: K3 / K3s Filters Available - Update (Doug Hensley)
>   8. K2 S/N.7723 Lives :) (Martin Sole)
>   9. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Ron D'Eau Claire)
>  10. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Graziano Roccon)
>  11. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Charlie T)
>  12. kxpd3 question (JEROME SODUS)
>  13. Re: kxpd3 question (Clay Autery)
>  14. Re: kxpd3 question (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP)
>  15. Re: kxpd3 question (rich hurd WC3T)
>  16. Re: Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028! (Charlie T)
>  17. Re: kxpd3 question ([email protected])
>  18. Re: kxpd3 question (Gary Smith)
>  19. Re: kxpd3 question (Dave Sublette)
>  20. Re: kxpd3 question (Mark Petiford)
>  21. Re: kxpd3 question (Ron D'Eau Claire)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:45:23 -0900
> From: Edward R Cole <[email protected]>
> To: Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> 
> Hmm, really doesn't matter (to me) who's first in sales.  10,000 
> sounds like a success and probably means it was a profitable venture 
> (only Wayne and Eric know what the break even point was).  As a 
> (former) small business  owner, I know that is not trivial to 
> estimate.  Even more important to achieve.
> 
> I think my order for a KX3 kit went in within the first day orders 
> were taken and I received SN 475.
> 
> I know the popularity of the FT-817, having owned one.  Only thing it 
> did better was operate crossband VHF/UHF for satellite operation.  I 
> now have an old surplus FT-736R which was designed for full crossband 
> duplex satellite operating (also my backup VHF/UHF FM/SSB rig).
> 
> But never cared for FT-817 small display or mediocre HF 
> performance.  I have the atu and 2m module and added the KXPA100, 
> which works really nice as mobile rig.  I bought it with 2m promised, 
> thinking of using that as IF for portable mw operating.  It will get 
> its first real workout Aug. 18/19 (2018) at the most northern point 
> in Michigan's UP attempting 10-GHz across Lake Superior to MN and 
> ON.  That weekend is the first of two for the ARRL 10-GHz Up Contest.
> 
> I like that I can switch between my K3/10 and KX3 seamlessly to use 
> the KXPA100 (especially on 6m-SSB) at home.
> 
> I operate VHF Contests on multiple bands so having the KX3 allows me 
> to monitor 6m continuously while working 2m and higher with the K3 
> plus transverters. I also use dedicated FM radios on 222 and 900 MHz 
> where there is no local SSB activity.
> 
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>   http://www.kl7uw.com
> Dubus-NA Business mail:
>   [email protected] 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:53:51 -0700
> From: Doug Person <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> I used the FT-817 for a long time for QRP CW, RTTY and PSK using a 
> NUE-PSK digital modem. It was as great combination and a lot of fun. I 
> now have a KX2 which , obviously, is very superior to the old 817. Yet 
> it was a very revolutionary radio that could do an incredible number of 
> things. I think the KX2/3 are also very revolutionary. An awesome 
> receiver in a hand-holdable, lightweight package. Bicycle mobile with 
> the KX2 is an amazing experience.
> 
> Doug -- K0DXV
> 
>> On 11/8/2017 2:45 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
>> Hmm, really doesn't matter (to me) who's first in sales.? 10,000 
>> sounds like a success and probably means it was a profitable venture 
>> (only Wayne and Eric know what the break even point was).? As a 
>> (former) small business? owner, I know that is not trivial to 
>> estimate.? Even more important to achieve.
>> 
>> I think my order for a KX3 kit went in within the first day orders 
>> were taken and I received SN 475.
>> 
>> I know the popularity of the FT-817, having owned one.? Only thing it 
>> did better was operate crossband VHF/UHF for satellite operation.? I 
>> now have an old surplus FT-736R which was designed for full crossband 
>> duplex satellite operating (also my backup VHF/UHF FM/SSB rig).
>> 
>> But never cared for FT-817 small display or mediocre HF performance.? 
>> I have the atu and 2m module and added the KXPA100, which works really 
>> nice as mobile rig.? I bought it with 2m promised, thinking of using 
>> that as IF for portable mw operating. It will get its first real 
>> workout Aug. 18/19 (2018) at the most northern point in Michigan's UP 
>> attempting 10-GHz across Lake Superior to MN and ON.? That weekend is 
>> the first of two for the ARRL 10-GHz Up Contest.
>> 
>> I like that I can switch between my K3/10 and KX3 seamlessly to use 
>> the KXPA100 (especially on 6m-SSB) at home.
>> 
>> I operate VHF Contests on multiple bands so having the KX3 allows me 
>> to monitor 6m continuously while working 2m and higher with the K3 
>> plus transverters. I also use dedicated FM radios on 222 and 900 MHz 
>> where there is no local SSB activity.
>> 
>> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>> ? http://www.kl7uw.com
>> Dubus-NA Business mail:
>> ? [email protected]
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 18:55:12 -0500
> From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> 
> Posted to the Elecraft list three months ago:
> 
>>> On 8/4/2017 8:10 PM, mpupeza mpupeza wrote:
>>> I ordered Koss UR40 cushions from Koss and they were $5.00 + $0.35 Tax (S+H
>>> FREE) to my Winter Home in Florida. Perfect fit but snug and awkward to 
>>> install.
>>> I looked how to do them on Youtube. There are several screws to loosen 
>>> under the
>>> rim of the old ones. They were mail delivered in less than a week. Much 
>>> cheaper
>>> than a new headset.
>>> Mike VE3EQP .....
> 
> 73,
> 
>    ... Joe, W4TV
> 
> 
>> On 11/8/2017 2:10 PM, Dick Grolleman wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I'm looking for replacement earpads for my Yamaha CM500. Yahama does not 
>> sell in EU.  I know some use Koss replacements. I can get Koss over here in 
>> EU. I just need to know which type does fit the Yamaha CM500. Any advise 
>> please.
>> 
>> 
>> 73 de Dick PA3FQA
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:08:11 -0300
> From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <[email protected]>
> To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Replacement earpads for Yamaha CM500
> Message-ID:
>    <CA+h_a7JZZFV2=hbLLkid54Lxh=qt29d0zrjrjzm3c+6padn...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> unfortunately not a friendly company
> 
> is hard to find on this days a company with this policies
> 
> *"The credit card has to be issued by a U.S. company and the billing
> address must be in the U.S"*
> 
> from amazon, maybe this work but not sure
> https://www.amazon.com/Products-Replacement-Headphone-Earpad-Cushion/dp/B01MR6PL5V/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1510186015&sr=8-4-fkmr0&keywords=koss+ur40+pads
> 
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> 
> 2017-11-08 20:55 GMT-03:00 Joe Subich, W4TV <[email protected]>:
> 
>> 
>> Posted to the Elecraft list three months ago:
>> 
>>> On 8/4/2017 8:10 PM, mpupeza mpupeza wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I ordered Koss UR40 cushions from Koss and they were $5.00 + $0.35 Tax
>>>> (S+H
>>>> FREE) to my Winter Home in Florida. Perfect fit but snug and awkward to
>>>> install.
>>>> I looked how to do them on Youtube. There are several screws to loosen
>>>> under the
>>>> rim of the old ones. They were mail delivered in less than a week. Much
>>>> cheaper
>>>> than a new headset.
>>>> Mike VE3EQP .....
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>>   ... Joe, W4TV
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11/8/2017 2:10 PM, Dick Grolleman wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> I'm looking for replacement earpads for my Yamaha CM500. Yahama does not
>>> sell in EU.  I know some use Koss replacements. I can get Koss over here in
>>> EU. I just need to know which type does fit the Yamaha CM500. Any advise
>>> please.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 73 de Dick PA3FQA
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:19:07 -0800
> From: Walter Underwood <[email protected]>
> To: elecraft <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8
> 
> Today on the SOTA mailing list, an activator in England (FT-817) reported 
> trying to work an activator in the Canary Islands (KX2). The KX2 operator 
> could copy, but the FT-817 operator could not. I couldn?t quite figure out 
> from the post whether it was SSB or CW.
> 
> wunder
> K6WRU
> Walter Underwood
> CM87wj
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> 
>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Doug Person <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I used the FT-817 for a long time for QRP CW, RTTY and PSK using a NUE-PSK 
>> digital modem. It was as great combination and a lot of fun. I now have a 
>> KX2 which , obviously, is very superior to the old 817. Yet it was a very 
>> revolutionary radio that could do an incredible number of things. I think 
>> the KX2/3 are also very revolutionary. An awesome receiver in a 
>> hand-holdable, lightweight package. Bicycle mobile with the KX2 is an 
>> amazing experience.
>> 
>> Doug -- K0DXV
>> 
>>> On 11/8/2017 2:45 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
>>> Hmm, really doesn't matter (to me) who's first in sales.  10,000 sounds 
>>> like a success and probably means it was a profitable venture (only Wayne 
>>> and Eric know what the break even point was).  As a (former) small business 
>>>  owner, I know that is not trivial to estimate.  Even more important to 
>>> achieve.
>>> 
>>> I think my order for a KX3 kit went in within the first day orders were 
>>> taken and I received SN 475.
>>> 
>>> I know the popularity of the FT-817, having owned one.  Only thing it did 
>>> better was operate crossband VHF/UHF for satellite operation.  I now have 
>>> an old surplus FT-736R which was designed for full crossband duplex 
>>> satellite operating (also my backup VHF/UHF FM/SSB rig).
>>> 
>>> But never cared for FT-817 small display or mediocre HF performance.  I 
>>> have the atu and 2m module and added the KXPA100, which works really nice 
>>> as mobile rig.  I bought it with 2m promised, thinking of using that as IF 
>>> for portable mw operating. It will get its first real workout Aug. 18/19 
>>> (2018) at the most northern point in Michigan's UP attempting 10-GHz across 
>>> Lake Superior to MN and ON.  That weekend is the first of two for the ARRL 
>>> 10-GHz Up Contest.
>>> 
>>> I like that I can switch between my K3/10 and KX3 seamlessly to use the 
>>> KXPA100 (especially on 6m-SSB) at home.
>>> 
>>> I operate VHF Contests on multiple bands so having the KX3 allows me to 
>>> monitor 6m continuously while working 2m and higher with the K3 plus 
>>> transverters. I also use dedicated FM radios on 222 and 900 MHz where there 
>>> is no local SSB activity.
>>> 
>>> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>>>  http://www.kl7uw.com
>>> Dubus-NA Business mail:
>>>  [email protected]
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 00:28:46 +0000
> From: Bill Johnson <[email protected]>
> To: Doug Person <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID:
>    
> <ro1p152mb0907a4aa73b968f0d03b3dde9c...@ro1p152mb0907.lamp152.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I think the K2 was available pre 2000 and I was a field tester.
> 
> 72 & 73,
> Bill
> K9YEQ, FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100,  KAT500, W2, etc. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Person
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> 
> Isn't that exactly the same life span of the K2 -- which is still available?
> 
> Doug -- K0DXV
> 
>> On 11/8/2017 5:59 AM, Graziano Roccon wrote:
>> Collins... 817... 706... K3...
>> You are all wrong. :-)
>> 
>> Sorry guys but i think is the Kenwood TS-2000, from 2000 to 2017 and still 
>> in production and for sale.
>> No other radio reach a so long time in production and availability on the 
>> market (maybe is a record).
>> 
>> Down the hat...
>> 
>> Ciao, Graziano IW2NOY
>> 
>> 
>>> Il 8 novembre 2017 alle 2.25 Raymond Sills <[email protected]> ha 
>>> scritto:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I say that the Yaesu FT-817 is king of the hill.   Over 250,000 sold, and 
>>> still selling.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 73 de Ray
>>> K2ULR
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Walter Underwood <[email protected]>
>>> To: Elecraft <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tue, Nov 7, 2017 7:57 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
>>> 
>>> We know that the K3 sold nearly 10,000, so add in the K3S sales, and that 
>>> is more than the KX3.
>>> 
>>> ICOM sure sold a lot of the IC-706 series. I would not be surprised to see 
>>> that at the top of the list.
>>> 
>>> If we are talking rigs made specifically for amateurs, the Collins S-line 
>>> might not qualify. If we are talking all HF, it is probably some marine or 
>>> aircraft HF box.
>>> 
>>> wunder
>>> K6WRU
>>> Walter Underwood
>>> CM87wj
>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to 
>>> [email protected]
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to 
>> [email protected]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
> delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 00:57:45 +0000
> From: Doug Hensley <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
>    Elecraft List    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 / K3s Filters Available - Update
> Message-ID:
>    
> <sn1pr15mb04137311adff4b06b9ba8ced91...@sn1pr15mb0413.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> The 1.0 kHz filters have been spoken for.
> 
> 
> Available still are two (2) each of:
> 
> 
> KFL3A-1.8K  1.8 kHz
> 
> 
> KFL3A-2.7K  2.7 kHz
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Doug W5JV
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Doug Hensley <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:02 AM
> To: [email protected]; Elecraft List
> Subject: Fw: K3 / K3s Filters Available - Adendum
> 
> 
> I forgot to put the Elecraft model numbers on the filters I have for sale:
> 
> 
> They are:
> 
> 
> KFL3A-1.0K     1 kHz
> 
> KFL3A-1.8K  1.8 kHz
> 
> KFL3A-2.7K  2.7 kHz
> 
> 
> I will have two (2) of each.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Doug W5JV
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Doug Hensley <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: K3 / K3s Filters Available
> 
> 
> In about a week I will be getting my K3S back from Elecraft service where I 
> sent
> 
> it in for updating.  While it is there, I am reconfiguring the crystal 
> filters and will
> 
> have the following available if anyone needs one or more:
> 
> 
> Two each 2.7 kHZ OEM SSB filters; list 139.95 sell 100.00 each;
> 
> Two each 1.8 kHZ wide data filters; list 149.95 sell 119.95 each;
> 
> Two each 1.0 kHZ wide CW filters; list 149.95 sell  119.95 each;
> 
> 
> The filters are less than 6 months old and hardly used.  You can buy one or 
> more
> 
> of these with confidence.  They are guaranteed to be as I describe.
> 
> 
> No paypal; simple personal check or money order (for faster shipping). 
> Shipping is
> 
> a flat $10 for one or more via USPS Priority Mail with tracking & some 
> insurance.
> 
> 
> To hold one or more: email me direct <<  W5JV @ HOTMAIL.COM >>.  Be patient &
> 
> I will respond as soon as I can.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Doug W5JV
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:06:47 +0700
> From: Martin Sole <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Elecraft] K2 S/N.7723 Lives :)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Just to say, that 7723 is alive and kicking albeit in a bare bones QRP 
> CW only format for the time being. I bought this as a way to pass a 
> little time stuck out in the desert and it did the job superbly.
> 
> Initial testing went well though I am a little concerned that the 20m 
> sensitivity is a little down, might just need a more careful alignment 
> of the bpf. I also need to do a proper setup of the IF filters with the pc.
> 
> Back home now and on some antennas it seems to be playing nicely.
> 
> The SSB module, 160m, NB and I/O kits are on hand and will join the 
> family soon.
> 
> Interesting to note the K2 was, according to Wikipedia, prototyped in 
> October 1997, so that radio is 20 years old and still being produced and 
> more importantly I think is still relevant. Has that bettered the 
> Collins S line?
> 
> So one of the very latest K2's joins one of the earliest K3's S/N 298. 
> Now I'm starting to think that might need some updating but I'm not sure 
> if there have been any major upgrades to the K3, barring the synthesiser 
> and the S of course.
> 
> Martin, HS0ZED
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:31:30 -0800
> From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Bill Johnson'" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <003001d35913$a0c96440$e25c2cc0$@biz>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Yep, 1998 I believe. I built mine in 2000 and it was S/N 1289 after working
> several of them on the air the previous year or so. 
> 
> 73, Ron AC7AC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Johnson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:29 PM
> To: Doug Person; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> 
> I think the K2 was available pre 2000 and I was a field tester.
> 
> 72 & 73,
> Bill
> K9YEQ, FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100,  KAT500, W2, etc. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Person
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> 
> Isn't that exactly the same life span of the K2 -- which is still available?
> 
> Doug -- K0DXV
> 
>> On 11/8/2017 5:59 AM, Graziano Roccon wrote:
>> Collins... 817... 706... K3...
>> You are all wrong. :-)
>> 
>> Sorry guys but i think is the Kenwood TS-2000, from 2000 to 2017 and still
> in production and for sale.
>> No other radio reach a so long time in production and availability on the
> market (maybe is a record).
>> 
>> Down the hat...
>> 
>> Ciao, Graziano IW2NOY
>> 
>> 
>>> Il 8 novembre 2017 alle 2.25 Raymond Sills <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I say that the Yaesu FT-817 is king of the hill.   Over 250,000 sold, and
> still selling.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 73 de Ray
>>> K2ULR
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Walter Underwood <[email protected]>
>>> To: Elecraft <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tue, Nov 7, 2017 7:57 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
>>> 
>>> We know that the K3 sold nearly 10,000, so add in the K3S sales, and that
> is more than the KX3.
>>> 
>>> ICOM sure sold a lot of the IC-706 series. I would not be surprised to
> see that at the top of the list.
>>> 
>>> If we are talking rigs made specifically for amateurs, the Collins S-line
> might not qualify. If we are talking all HF, it is probably some marine or
> aircraft HF box.
>>> 
>>> wunder
>>> K6WRU
>>> Walter Underwood
>>> CM87wj
>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to 
>>> [email protected]
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to 
>> [email protected]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
> delivered to [email protected]
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
> delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:41:24 +0100 (CET)
> From: Graziano Roccon <[email protected]>
> To: Ron D'Eau Claire <[email protected]>, [email protected],    Doug
>    Person <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> You are right, 1998, following the first assumption of Doug.
> Also FT-817 is correct, but i think that numbers of sales are still for the 
> TS-2000.
> 
> Ciao, Graziano IW2NOY
> 
>> Il 8 novembre 2017 alle 18.11 Ron D'Eau Claire <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>> 
>> 
>> I believe the K2 was sold in 1998. I built mine in 2000 after working a few
>> on the air. My K2 is S/N 1289. 
>> 
>> 73, Ron AC7AC
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Person
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 8:41 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
>> 
>> Isn't that exactly the same life span of the K2 -- which is still available?
>> 
>> Doug -- K0DXV
>> 
>>> On 11/8/2017 5:59 AM, Graziano Roccon wrote:
>>> Collins... 817... 706... K3...
>>> You are all wrong. :-)
>>> 
>>> Sorry guys but i think is the Kenwood TS-2000, from 2000 to 2017 and still
>> in production and for sale.
>>> No other radio reach a so long time in production and availability on the
>> market (maybe is a record).
>>> 
>>> Down the hat...
>>> 
>>> Ciao, Graziano IW2NOY
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 09:08:16 -0500
> From: "Charlie T" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
> 
> The Collins KWM-2 was in production from 1959 to 1982.....23 years.
> Charlie k3ICH
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graziano Roccon
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 8:41 AM
> To: Ron D'Eau Claire <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Doug Person
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> 
> You are right, 1998, following the first assumption of Doug.
> Also FT-817 is correct, but i think that numbers of sales are still for the
> TS-2000.
> 
> Ciao, Graziano IW2NOY
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 09:14:41 -0500 (EST)
> From: JEROME SODUS <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a "know-code-ham" and so have signed 
> up to a course by CWops.
> 
> They require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done at 
> 20-wpm.
> 
> 
> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I think that a 
> single paddle might work best for me.
> 
> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
> 
> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence with a 
> dual-paddle,
> 
> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
> 
> 
> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it seems to me that the KXPD3 
> is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I missed something?
> 
> 
> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an external key (I presume a 
> single-paddle).
> 
> In the past, I recall seeing photos of hams working KX3-portable with a 
> straight-key but, at those times, I did not pay attention if any had a paddle.
> 
> 
> TIA for any reply.
> 
> 73 Jerry KM3K
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:31:35 -0600
> From: Clay Autery <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> JUST finished Level 1 of the CW Academy here.
> 
> I chose the Begali HST Mark II.? They've moved on to the Mark III now.
> They are expensive, but I have absolutely zero regrets.? I love, love, 
> love, my key.? Worth every cent I paid for it.
> 
> When I pass 25 wpm and hopefully gain entry to CW Ops, I will treat 
> myself to a Sculpture Mono... just because.? Frankly, I'll never NEED 
> another key.
> 
> IF you are serious.... don't muck around.? Get a serious key. "Buy the 
> best tools you can afford, and only have to buy them once." -My Dad
> 
> I can't help you with the KX3 questions...? My K3s works just fine with 
> a single paddle.
> 
> 73,
> Clay, KY5G
> 
> 
>> On 11/09/17 08:14, JEROME SODUS wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a "know-code-ham" and so have 
>> signed up to a course by CWops.
>> 
>> They require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done at 
>> 20-wpm.
>> 
>> 
>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I think that 
>> a single paddle might work best for me.
>> 
>> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>> 
>> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence with a 
>> dual-paddle,
>> 
>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
>> 
>> 
>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it seems to me that the KXPD3 
>> is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I missed something?
>> 
>> 
>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an external key (I presume a 
>> single-paddle).
>> 
>> In the past, I recall seeing photos of hams working KX3-portable with a 
>> straight-key but, at those times, I did not pay attention if any had a 
>> paddle.
>> 
>> 
>> TIA for any reply.
>> 
>> 73 Jerry KM3K
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:33:46 +0200
> From: Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> A real single paddle is nice, but you can still send non-iambically with
> a dual paddle. Just don't squeeze it. You make a 'C' with four back and
> forth motions instead of a squeeze.
> 
> The connections to the rig for a single or dual paddle are the same. The 
> only difference is in the mechanical design of the paddle. A single 
> paddle cannot close both dit and dah contacts at the same time. With a 
> dual paddle, you can -- but you don't need to.
> 
> 73,
> Victor, 4X6GP
> Rehovot, Israel
> Formerly K2VCO
> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
> CWA Adviser
> 
>> On 9 Nov 2017 16:14, JEROME SODUS wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a "know-code-ham" and so
>> have signed up to a course by CWops.
>> 
>> They require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done
>> at 20-wpm.
>> 
>> 
>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I
>> think that a single paddle might work best for me.
>> 
>> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>> 
>> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence
>> with a dual-paddle,
>> 
>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
>> 
>> 
>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it seems to me that
>> the KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I missed
>> something?
>> 
>> 
>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an external key (I
>> presume a single-paddle).
>> 
>> In the past, I recall seeing photos of hams working KX3-portable with
>> a straight-key but, at those times, I did not pay attention if any
>> had a paddle.
>> 
>> 
>> TIA for any reply.
>> 
>> 73 Jerry KM3K 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:00:12 -0500
> From: rich hurd WC3T <[email protected]>
> To: Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID:
>    <CABYU7Wi0ygzDTkP2OzOuSVd=6mf7g8ee8rid-e_pnuu1jcg...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Victor brings up an advantage of using a dual paddle; if at some point in
> the future, you want to use an iambic keying method, using a dual paddle
> would afford you that capability with the initial spend.
> 
> If you never do iambic, it's only a small incremental cost between a single
> and a dual lever paddle that you'll probably never miss.
> 
> He's sort of talking me into reconsidering my single lever paddle
> purchase.   :)
> 
> ---
> 72,
> Rich Hurd / WC3T / DMR: 3142737
> PA Army MARS, Northampton County RACES, EPA-ARRL Public Information Officer
> for Scouting
> Latitude: 40.761621 Longitude: -75.288988  (40?45.68' N 75?17.33' W) Grid:
> *FN20is*
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Jerry,
>> 
>> A real single paddle is nice, but you can still send non-iambically with
>> a dual paddle. Just don't squeeze it. You make a 'C' with four back and
>> forth motions instead of a squeeze.
>> 
>> The connections to the rig for a single or dual paddle are the same. The
>> only difference is in the mechanical design of the paddle. A single paddle
>> cannot close both dit and dah contacts at the same time. With a dual
>> paddle, you can -- but you don't need to.
>> 
>> 73,
>> Victor, 4X6GP
>> Rehovot, Israel
>> Formerly K2VCO
>> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
>> CWA Adviser
>> 
>> 
>>> On 9 Nov 2017 16:14, JEROME SODUS wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a "know-code-ham" and so
>>> have signed up to a course by CWops.
>>> 
>>> They require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done
>>> at 20-wpm.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I
>>> think that a single paddle might work best for me.
>>> 
>>> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>>> 
>>> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence
>>> with a dual-paddle,
>>> 
>>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it seems to me that
>>> the KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I missed
>>> something?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an external key (I
>>> presume a single-paddle).
>>> 
>>> In the past, I recall seeing photos of hams working KX3-portable with
>>> a straight-key but, at those times, I did not pay attention if any
>>> had a paddle.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> TIA for any reply.
>>> 
>>> 73 Jerry KM3K
>>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:09:42 -0500
> From: "Charlie T" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="utf-8"
> 
> Yes, you are QUITE wrong.....
> AND, you can fix it if it breaks.... for probably less than the cost of  
> shipping the new stuff one way to any of the big three service centers.
> C
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graziano Roccon [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 9:18 AM
> To: Charlie T <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just RX'd KX3 Serial No. 10,028!
> 
> Dedicated to very rich people only... or i am wrong ?
> 
> 
> 
>> Il 9 novembre 2017 alle 15.08 Charlie T <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>> 
>> 
>> The Collins KWM-2 was in production from 1959 to 1982.....23 years.
>> Charlie k3ICH
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:36:31 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> Hi Jerry,
> 
> I made the decision to use a single lever paddle and not learn the  
> "squeeze" technique needed to run a dual lever paddle. Several reasons:
> 
> The truly high speed guys use single lever paddles--they feel they make  
> fewer mistakes with the single lever.
> 
> If you learn the single lever technique you can use a dual lever paddle and 
> just not "squeeze"
> 
> The dual lever technique doesn't save that much time.
> 
> I think that a lot of the impetus to a dual lever is "CQ", both letters are 
> "squeeze" letters and if you are sending it a lot it is easier to send 
> repeated  CQ's with a dual lever paddle.
> 
> I think regular practice is needed with both single an dual lever  paddles.
> 
> I am fond of my Begali Sculpture single lever, along with my Tony Baleno  
> single lever.
> 
> If you go single lever, if you occasionally use a dual lever paddle you  
> will be happier with minimal space between the paddles; it's closer to the  
> distance your fingers need to move for the single lever.  Begali's Magnum  
> has 
> a very narrow space and I use it as well as my Sculpture single lever.   
> Tony Baleno of N3ZN keys will make a dual lever with what ever spacing 
> between 
> the paddles you want.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> 73
> 
> Mike KD8RQE
> 
> 
> In a message dated 11/9/2017 9:31:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
> [email protected] writes:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a  "know-code-ham" and so have 
> signed up to a course by CWops.
> 
> They  require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done at  
> 20-wpm.
> 
> 
> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that  effort, I think 
> that a single paddle might work best for me.
> 
> Here are  the negative items which helped form that opinion:
> 
> 1. a comment that  regular practice is needed to maintain competence with a 
> dual-paddle,
> 
> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically  complicated.
> 
> 
> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it  seems to me that the 
> KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I  missed something?
> 
> 
> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an  external key (I presume 
> a single-paddle).
> 
> In the past, I recall seeing  photos of hams working KX3-portable with a 
> straight-key but, at those times, I  did not pay attention if any had a 
> paddle.
> 
> 
> TIA for any  reply.
> 
> 73 Jerry  KM3K
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft  mailing list
> Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:  mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to  [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:30:39 -0500
> From: "Gary Smith" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> I learned on a Navy key and when I got my 
> license, Iambic was a new thing but those 
> who used it, swore by it. There were a few 
> interfaces that used what I think was a 
> Curtis 8044 IC and it was a fantastic chip 
> to learn Iambic with. I had a "Ham Keyer" 
> which used it and later made my own using 
> this chip. It had two settings for Iambic 
> and one seemed more natural than the other 
> so I stuck with it. 
> 
> I then bought a (at the time) new Corsair 
> II from TenTec which had a keyer built in 
> for Iambic but I never liked the way it 
> felt or operated so I stuck with that 
> Curtis chip. When I bought the K3 kit & 
> checked out the built-in Iambic option and 
> it was exactly what I had come to love all 
> along so the Curtis is now on the shelf 
> beside the Corsair for when I'll fire that 
> up again in the future. FWIW, the K3s has 
> that same functionality and I'm guessing 
> the other Elecraft rigs have the same as 
> well.
> 
> Iambic is efficient, it requires I think, 
> less motions to accomplish the same 
> character and it flows like water with 
> such little effort. I also use a Begali 
> Sculpture but I started with a Bencher 
> Iambic paddle, moved to a Vibroplex Iambic 
> and finally to the Begali. The original 
> Bencher came apart easily and always when 
> I was excited and I had to put it back 
> together (easy to do but not an elegant 
> thing). Maybe they've attended to this 
> flaw by now? The Vibroplex worked very 
> well but seemed to require occasional 
> attention and could have been heavier to 
> stay in place during my moments of 
> exuberance. I ordered the Begali maybe 3 
> years ago and never have had to touch it. 
> I'm sure the other Iambic paddles made by 
> hand are just as good. I will likely keep 
> this one for what time I have left.
> 
> As the Iambic from the rig is spaced 
> perfectly as regards timing, it is a 
> perfect teacher as to how to send well. 
> Set your speed, go into the test mode so 
> you don't transmit and practice with 
> headphones to your heart's content. You 
> will find it intuitive and what you will 
> need to focus on is not running your 
> characters and words together as it is so 
> easy to send, you forget the point of 
> error is you and your not sending with the 
> proper gaps between characters and words.
> 
> The way to best do this on the K3/K3s is 
> to go to test mode! Now push the TEXT DEC 
> on the front panel for decoding CW, select 
> the TX ONLY option and you can read what 
> you're sending on the LCD and this will 
> help you get your character spacing and 
> word spacing down just right.
> 
> Lastly, I'm sure that whatever key you 
> get, you'll learn how to be comfortable 
> with it. For me, & me being a musician, 
> the timing is everything and again, for 
> me... Iambic was the easiest way to do it 
> right with the least effort.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Gary
> KA1J
> 
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a "know-code-ham" and so have
>> signed up to a course by CWops.
>> 
>> They require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done
>> at 20-wpm.
>> 
>> 
>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I think
>> that a single paddle might work best for me.
>> 
>> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>> 
>> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence
>> with a dual-paddle,
>> 
>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
>> 
>> 
>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it seems to me that the
>> KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I missed
>> something?
>> 
>> 
>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an external key (I
>> presume a single-paddle).
>> 
>> In the past, I recall seeing photos of hams working KX3-portable with
>> a straight-key but, at those times, I did not pay attention if any had
>> a paddle.
>> 
>> 
>> TIA for any reply.
>> 
>> 73 Jerry KM3K
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:43:03 -0500
> From: Dave Sublette <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> Don?t obsess over which paddle is best for you.  Which ever system you 
> choose, it will take hours and hours of off the air practice before you 
> "should? put it on the air.  Which ever system you start with, you will learn 
> to love and prefer ? if you get that far.
> 
> I use iambic B and a dual paddle, but don?t often use the squeeze feature.  
> If you start with this, as others have pointed out, you don?t have to 
> squeeze.  My opinion is (and it is just an opinion) by starting with the dual 
> paddle, Iambic B, you give yourself the most options to expand or change 
> methods.  
> 
> It is mostly timing and getting your internal ?clock? to a place where you 
> make proper, readable communication using Morse.  An automatic keyer doesn?t 
> do this for you.  I hear plenty of people using keys who don?t send code that 
> is comfortable to copy.
> 
> Pick something and start practicing.  You will never master it until you 
> start.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave, K4TO 
>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Mike via Elecraft <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jerry,
>> 
>> I made the decision to use a single lever paddle and not learn the  
>> "squeeze" technique needed to run a dual lever paddle. Several reasons:
>> 
>> The truly high speed guys use single lever paddles--they feel they make  
>> fewer mistakes with the single lever.
>> 
>> If you learn the single lever technique you can use a dual lever paddle and 
>> just not "squeeze"
>> 
>> The dual lever technique doesn't save that much time.
>> 
>> I think that a lot of the impetus to a dual lever is "CQ", both letters are 
>> "squeeze" letters and if you are sending it a lot it is easier to send 
>> repeated  CQ's with a dual lever paddle.
>> 
>> I think regular practice is needed with both single an dual lever  paddles.
>> 
>> I am fond of my Begali Sculpture single lever, along with my Tony Baleno  
>> single lever.
>> 
>> If you go single lever, if you occasionally use a dual lever paddle you  
>> will be happier with minimal space between the paddles; it's closer to the  
>> distance your fingers need to move for the single lever.  Begali's Magnum  
>> has 
>> a very narrow space and I use it as well as my Sculpture single lever.   
>> Tony Baleno of N3ZN keys will make a dual lever with what ever spacing 
>> between 
>> the paddles you want.
>> 
>> Hope this helps.
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Mike KD8RQE
>> 
>> 
>> In a message dated 11/9/2017 9:31:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>> [email protected] writes:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a  "know-code-ham" and so have 
>> signed up to a course by CWops.
>> 
>> They  require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done at  
>> 20-wpm.
>> 
>> 
>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that  effort, I think 
>> that a single paddle might work best for me.
>> 
>> Here are  the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>> 
>> 1. a comment that  regular practice is needed to maintain competence with a 
>> dual-paddle,
>> 
>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically  complicated.
>> 
>> 
>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it  seems to me that the 
>> KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I  missed something?
>> 
>> 
>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an  external key (I presume 
>> a single-paddle).
>> 
>> In the past, I recall seeing  photos of hams working KX3-portable with a 
>> straight-key but, at those times, I  did not pay attention if any had a 
>> paddle.
>> 
>> 
>> TIA for any  reply.
>> 
>> 73 Jerry  KM3K
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft  mailing list
>> Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post:  mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to  [email protected]
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Mark Petiford <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], JEROME SODUS <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Jerome,
> I'm not sure why anyone would go through the process of learning to send CW 
> and do it "single paddle".? Every radio in production supports one, or both, 
> Iambic modes, and they are actually easier to LEARN than they are to 
> UNDERSTAND!? Here is my 2-cents worth:
> 
> 1.? The best method of sending will be the one you learn first.? This is true 
> of MOST things we learn.? That doesn't mean you can't learn a second method 
> later, but USUALLY the first method will come back to you the easiest.
> 
> 2.? Reading about the differences in Iambic keying is far more complex than 
> slowing the keyer down and listening to what happens.? Slow down to around 
> 10wpm, hold one paddle down and tap the other to learn how dit or dah 
> insertion works and sounds.? Hold both paddles down and listen to what 
> happens when you release them.? Play with it, but do it at slow speed so you 
> can hear it.? I am NOT talking about learning characters yet.? That should 
> happen at much faster speeds, and after you know what the paddles do to make 
> dots and dashes at the right times.? After playing with this for as long as 
> you need, speed it up a bit and play some more.? Eventually you can work up 
> to the speed CW Ops recommends for learning the characters.
> 
> 3.? Stop trying to decide between Iambic A and B based on the analysis of 
> what they do or how many paddle movements are required.? You can listen to 
> the differences as I have outlined in 2 above, but simply PICK ONE.? I happen 
> to like Iambic B because I learned on a homebrew AccuKeyer which died years 
> ago.? I can switch to Iambic A with a few minutes of practice, but I prefer 
> Iambic B simply because it doesn't seem to be as sensitive to paddle release 
> after holding both paddles closed in the letter C.? Oops, there I go with too 
> much analysis!
> 
> 4.? Dual paddles can be used as a single paddle.? I suspect most of the 
> single paddle operatiors were extensive bug users first (again, first learned 
> is the easiest), but I couldn't afford a bug, so I learned Iambic B.? I find 
> that transitioning from Iambic B to single paddle is easy.? I do that when 
> necessary at events like Field Day.
> 
> 5.? No more maintenance is required for dual paddle modes than for any other 
> mode.? It all depends on what you learned first and what you use the most.? 
> In aviation, a pilot's total flight time is important, but accident reports 
> indicate that recent experience is also important.? Look at the aviation 
> regulations for recent experience and you will see what I mean.? Same for CW.
> 
> Well, I went over 2 cents worth!
> 
> Mark
> KE6BB
> 
> 
>    On Thursday, November 9, 2017, 6:32:28 AM PST, JEROME SODUS 
> <[email protected]> wrote:  
> 
> 
> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that effort, I think that a 
> single paddle might work best for me.
> 
> Here are the negative items which helped form that opinion:
> 
> 1. a comment that regular practice is needed to maintain competence with a 
> dual-paddle,
> 
> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically complicated.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:12:35 -0800
> From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Dave Sublette'" <[email protected]>,    <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> Message-ID: <002701d35986$52526e60$f6f74b20$@biz>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="UTF-8"
> 
> After more than 50 years "pounding brass", mostly with either a bug 
> (semi-automatic) key or paddles I still make time for practice sessions - 
> especially if I've been off the air for a while. My favorite is to send 
> names, addresses and numbers from a telephone book (they are getting rare, 
> but still around) with the goal of getting through one full page without a 
> flub. 
> 
> 73, Ron AC7AC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Sublette
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 9:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] kxpd3 question
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> Don?t obsess over which paddle is best for you.  Which ever system you 
> choose, it will take hours and hours of off the air practice before you 
> "should? put it on the air.  Which ever system you start with, you will learn 
> to love and prefer ? if you get that far.
> 
> I use iambic B and a dual paddle, but don?t often use the squeeze feature.  
> If you start with this, as others have pointed out, you don?t have to 
> squeeze.  My opinion is (and it is just an opinion) by starting with the dual 
> paddle, Iambic B, you give yourself the most options to expand or change 
> methods.  
> 
> It is mostly timing and getting your internal ?clock? to a place where you 
> make proper, readable communication using Morse.  An automatic keyer doesn?t 
> do this for you.  I hear plenty of people using keys who don?t send code that 
> is comfortable to copy.
> 
> Pick something and start practicing.  You will never master it until you 
> start.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave, K4TO 
>> On Nov 9, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Mike via Elecraft <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jerry,
>> 
>> I made the decision to use a single lever paddle and not learn the 
>> "squeeze" technique needed to run a dual lever paddle. Several reasons:
>> 
>> The truly high speed guys use single lever paddles--they feel they 
>> make fewer mistakes with the single lever.
>> 
>> If you learn the single lever technique you can use a dual lever 
>> paddle and just not "squeeze"
>> 
>> The dual lever technique doesn't save that much time.
>> 
>> I think that a lot of the impetus to a dual lever is "CQ", both 
>> letters are "squeeze" letters and if you are sending it a lot it is 
>> easier to send repeated  CQ's with a dual lever paddle.
>> 
>> I think regular practice is needed with both single an dual lever  paddles.
>> 
>> I am fond of my Begali Sculpture single lever, along with my Tony 
>> Baleno single lever.
>> 
>> If you go single lever, if you occasionally use a dual lever paddle 
>> you will be happier with minimal space between the paddles; it's 
>> closer to the distance your fingers need to move for the single lever.  
>> Begali's Magnum  has
>> a very narrow space and I use it as well as my Sculpture single lever.   
>> Tony Baleno of N3ZN keys will make a dual lever with what ever spacing 
>> between the paddles you want.
>> 
>> Hope this helps.
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Mike KD8RQE
>> 
>> 
>> In a message dated 11/9/2017 9:31:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
>> [email protected] writes:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm a "no-code-ham" determined to become a  "know-code-ham" and so 
>> have signed up to a course by CWops.
>> 
>> They  require a paddle for sending practice since lessons will be done 
>> at 20-wpm.
>> 
>> 
>> Having researched the topic of 'paddles' and from that  effort, I 
>> think that a single paddle might work best for me.
>> 
>> Here are  the negative items which helped form that opinion:
>> 
>> 1. a comment that  regular practice is needed to maintain competence 
>> with a dual-paddle,
>> 
>> 2. iambic-a or iambic-b just seem physically  complicated.
>> 
>> 
>> In reading my KX3-manual and Fred-KE7X's book, it  seems to me that 
>> the
>> KXPD3 is capable of only dual-paddle operating. Or have I  missed something?
>> 
>> 
>> I understand that my KX3 has a second port for an  external key (I 
>> presume a single-paddle).
>> 
>> In the past, I recall seeing  photos of hams working KX3-portable with 
>> a straight-key but, at those times, I  did not pay attention if any had a 
>> paddle.
>> 
>> 
>> TIA for any  reply.
>> 
>> 73 Jerry  KM3K
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft  mailing list
>> Home:  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post:  mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by:  http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>> email list:  http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to  
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to 
>> [email protected]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
> delivered to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> You must be a subscriber to post.
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> 
> End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 163, Issue 9
> ****************************************
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to