Maybe I missed it, but there once was a link on the Elecraft website with 
filter recommendations.

73 de Jim-AD6CW 

> On Mar 9, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Kjeld Holm <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Agree
> And just want to tell you that I am using Filter width=1500 and Filter=750. 
> Vy 73 de OZ1CCM 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Johnson
> Sent: 9. marts 2018 02:36
> To: Elecraft List
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 1.8 kHz SSB Filter
> 
> Yes!
> 
> 73,
> Bill
> K9YEQ
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
> Behalf Of Bob McGraw K4TAX
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:22 PM
> To: Elecraft List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 1.8 kHz SSB Filter
> 
> I definitely agree regarding having a 1.8 kHz filter for SSB is a positive 
> attribute.   In fact both of my radios have 1.8 kHz filters. And by reducing 
> the DSP BW to 1.8 kHz and shifting the PBT, one would be amazed at how well a 
> SSB signal really sounds. Certainly worth the investment in my experience.
> 
> 73
> 
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
>> On 3/8/2018 4:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:57:32 -0500
>> From: Craig Buck<[email protected]>
>> To: Chuck Chandler<[email protected]> Cc:[email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Planning the next filters
>> Message-ID:
>>    <caaq9xabk9igcpbvmb8ognzxnmj0h1k2x87f1dx1fjsczk_p...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>> 
>> Get the 1.8 if you work ssb.  Experiment with shifting the pass band 
>> for maximum clarity.  Youll be amazed just how narrow it can get and 
>> still be understandable.
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2018 11:24 AM, "Chuck Chandler"<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Right now I have the stock SSB and a 400 Hz filter in both main and 
>>> sub rcvrs.  I would like to add some a few at a time.  My first 
>>> priority is to add a couple to the main receiver, since it is the 
>>> biggest chore to get to.
>>> 
>>> I plan on a 250 Hz CW filter, but am going back and forth between the
>>> 2.1 and 1.8 kHz filters.  I know that narrowing the DSP to 1.8 gives 
>>> a really difficult to understand voice signal, while the 2.1 allows 
>>> in more adjacent signals.  However, the roofing filters may not behave in 
>>> the same manner.
>>> For example, the 1.8 could be set to turn on at 2.1 to take advantage 
>>> of skirt shape.
>>> 
>>> I primarily DX, and operate in some contests as well.  I know SSB 
>>> contests really need a narrow SSB filter.
>>> 
>>> Any suggestions on the matter from those who have gone this route before?
>>> 
>>> 73 de Chuck, WS1L
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
> delivered to [email protected] 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
> delivered to [email protected]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [email protected]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to