Bill,
It's more than just software control of the hardware. For instance, it
allows for a really tight integration of spotting software, logging, contest
software. All of this limited or biased toward how you operate or what you are
primarily after.
I personally use manual and software as a function of convenience at that
moment. But, I have no problem clicking on a spot and having everything go
there and waiting for me, to include setting up logging. You might just view
this as just another tool in the kit to maximize your operating.
73,
Barry
K3NDM
On March 27, 2018 10:32:30 AM EDT, Bill DeVore <[email protected]> wrote:
>I posted the question in the QRZ and eHam forums but only got one
>response so far.
>
>I’m evaluating the latest edition of Win4K3 and I’m not sure I see the
>advantage of controlling the K Line through software as compared to
>doing so directly.
>
>I want to be fair to the author so what am I missing that others see so
>advantageous?
>
>Bill - W3PNM
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:[email protected]
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>Message delivered to [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
