Steve It did get traction.
I routinely now see FT8 signals on 50.313, 50.323 and even 50.333 at times when the band is open over the Atlantic. Mike va3mw On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Steve Kavanagh via Elecraft < elecraft@mailman.qth.net> wrote: > Mark > > As you may know, WB5JJJ suggested using a separate frequency on 6m for > contest mode FT8, and leaving 50.313 for those running normal FT8 format. > I tend to think this might work out fairly well, but it didn't gain much > traction on the WSJT group where he posted the suggestion. > > But this wouldn't necessarily result in much less QRM/pile-up > depth...perhaps a factor of two reduction > > > 73, > Steve VE3SMA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to va...@portcredit.net > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
