The article is on-line:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sunspot-cycle-is-more-intricate-than-previously-thought/

73,
Randy, KS4L

> On Jul 21, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Dauer, Edward <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This month’s Scientific American has an interesting one-page article on 
> sunspots.  The 11-year cycle (the Schwabe cycle) is the one we tend to focus 
> on, but there are 88 year cycles (the Gleissberg), occasional 200 year peaks 
> (Suess-DeVries), and a 2,400 year (Hallstatt) cycle as well.  The longer 
> cycles look like modulation envelopes with the shorter cycles constrained 
> within them.
> 
> It seems from the graphic that we are only a few hundred years off the low of 
> the 2,400 year cycle as well as suffering the bottom of the 11 year.  The 
> last peak of the 2,400 year looks like it was at about the year 300 CE (a/k/a 
>  AD).  So the next Hallstatt peak should be due in around 600 years, if I am 
> interpolating from the graphics correctly.  I should probably replace all the 
> coax by then.
> 
> The article is non-technical but visually striking.  I have no way to post 
> it, and shouldn’t without SA’s permission anyway; but I can send a pdf copy 
> by return e-mail attachment if anyone wants one.  Request off line please 
> since this is sort of OT.
> 
> Ted, KN1CBR
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to