KK9A wrote:

"...if the heat generated is approximately the same with all power levels,
why do RTTY ops use lower power..."

First, the heat generated is not actually approximately the same with all
power levels. To a first crude approximation, the heat generated is made up
of two components. One component is due to such things as biasing for
linearity, and is approximately constant whenever the amp is in transmit
(it's still non-zero, but quite a bit smaller, when the amp is in standby),
and the other component is related to the actual signal being generated,
and is approximately linear with output power. At low output powers, the
first component dominates, while at higher powers the second component
becomes significant. The power consumption efficiency goes from zero at
zero power (some mains current being used but generating zero output) to a
maximum when the signal-related component is largest compared to the
constant component, i.e. at maximum power.

Second, what is dissipated is the accumulated heat energy, not power. Heat
removal processes are far slower than output power changes, so effectively
they integrate the thermal power generation over a significant time
interval. If the instantaneous power is the same in two modes, but the
duty-cycle factor for one mode is twice the duty factor for the other mode,
then the signal-related component of the energy to be dissipated in a given
time period will be twice as high for the high-duty mode. The total energy
to be dissipated will not be as much as twice as high because of the
constant component, but it will still be higher in the higher duty cycle
mode. Depending on the thermal design of the amplifier, that may or may not
be enough of an increase to require derating.

73,
Rich VE3KI
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to