This thread is hilarious!!! There is an AI joke somewhere in here about a dummy load....
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 1:50 AM, kevinr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds like a project for a neural network. A bit of AI which 'recognizes' > patterns. There would be ~ 40 outputs for letters, numbers, and symbols. I > am unsure of the number of inputs nor of the middle layer(s) of the net. But > that's just a bit of engineering. > > The training sets would consist of a large set of "Lake Erie swing music" and > expert interpretations of it. Find a large computer and spend a few weeks > training the NN. > > There are some shortcuts I foresee. Quite a few characters can't (?) be > messed up by the misuse of a bug. T, O, M, etc. Those don't really need to > go through the NN so you can save on the number of outputs and decrease the > training time significantly. > > The neat things is once you've done all this work you can put the trained NN > into a very small space of code. And use a moderate number of processor > cycles. > > Not quite DSP but AI is just another acronym :) > > 73, > > Kevin. KD5ONS > > - > >> On 1/12/19 8:30 PM, Eric Norris wrote: >> Might I suggest a filter that translates a bug user who sends at 15wpm, but >> the dots are set to 35wpm. The filter would briefly store the cw, correct >> the timing, and then pass it through the audio stages. Call it the >> VibroDummy, or VD1 filter setting. >> >> Another one would filter out the long "annnnd uuuuuhhhhh..." of VOX users >> who only transmit 50% or less of transmit time as intelligible speech, >> remove the non data periods, then pass the compressed version on. Call it >> the VoxDummy, or VD2 filter. >> >> Finally, introduce NR so sophisticated it automatically finds the correct >> tuning soloution, requiring another 4 cu ft of room inside the K3 for >> microprocessers and memory. Release it in a bloated, gigantic case, add 50 >> controls to the front panel, and call it a K4, thereby silencing two sets >> of critics who post--but do not read--on the reflector. >> >> 73 Eric WD6DBM >> >>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 12:08 PM Wayne Burdick <[email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for all the many great suggestions and digressions, folks. Sorry I >>> can't respond to all of them right away. >>> >>> My favorite so far is the request for Semantic Filtering Mode (SFM), which >>> "might, with skillful adjustment, suppress political commentary from 75 >>> meters." Our DSP IC does include odd/even partisan check bits, so this is a >>> SMOP. >>> >>> Runner-up is a proposal for auto-detection of unattended FT8 >>> transmissions, i.e. the "No One's Home AlarM" (NOHAM). >>> >>> Feel free to pile on... >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[email protected] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [email protected] >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
