On May 26, 2006, at 9:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Whether the rig was simple or complex, the small panel/deep
chassis idea became the most common, even for rigs that would obviously never be used mobile. It became electro-politically incorrect to build a ham rig any other way, even though the original reason for the form factor was gone (2). That
influence continues to the present day.

Very intriguing idea. I think methods of construction may have had some influence as well. If you consider miniature receiving tubes and a chassis about 1 1/2" to 2" tall, you end up with a rig about 6-8" high. Going taller doesn't help unless you rotate the tubes to the front panel (in which case they would be horizontal, which may not be good).

This is pretty much true of any AM table-top radio from the 40s or 50s.

If we made these old radios 10 or 12" tall, how do we effectively use all the space in the box more than 5" above the chassis?

Seems to me the reason that radios got smaller is because components got smaller.

Today, we're not so restricted by components, they are small and can be placed in any orientation. In fact, there's no reason the rig has to be rectangular.

I think you are on to something with the form factor, though. The aspect ratios of the K2 are about the same as a Collins or old Heathkit SB series rigs. Something like the old Drake series is much narrower and deeper.

There's also some variations on this theme. Think of portable receivers -- how many radios follow the same form factor of of the Zenith Trans-Oceanic?

So, this begs this question -- what's the "right" aspect ratios for a desktop rig?

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to