A low-pass filter will not change RFI either coming into the shack or going out. There are low-pass filters in all transceivers produced by Elecraft (and most other manufacturers), and they are in both the transmit and receive path. The current FCC requirement is for the 2nd harmonic be suppressed by 43 dB over the fundamental. Low pass filters come from a past era when the FCC requirements were not as stringent and TVs responded to those higher order harmonics from amateur transmitters. That is no longer the case.

Considering receive, we do have many sources of unintentional radiation which is present in the HF spectrum, and other than locating and having the offending device turned off, there is not much we can do about it. Although if it is interfering with licensed operation, there is recourse by cooperation with the FCC. The products giving problems range from inexpensive switching power sources (read wall-warts) to control circuits in many household appliances and other consumer devices, and even some lighting products.

If you are operating in an environment like Field Day where there are multiple transmitters operating in close proximity, bandpass filters and single band antennas are the normal "cure" as well as physical separation of the antennas.

73,
Don W3FPR



On 2/17/2019 5:59 PM, Richards wrote:
Good day -   What is the consensus concerning low-pass filters to minimize RFI both coming in and going out  of the shack?   Is there a type or size, brand or model that comes highly recommended?  Is it prudent to employ one, regardless of whether or not there is a known, identified problem , i.e., just in case?  Does it assist reception as well as transmission?

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to