Heh. News to me. I’ve been operating without displays for 31 years and change :-)
Although, I admit, voice-activated interfaces don’t seem to be terribly compatible with rooms full of ops shouting “CQ contest” … > On Mar 25, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Bert <[email protected]> wrote: > > You would still need some kind of display to verify the voice instruction > or order to the radio, so one way or another you need something visual. > > I guess an audio response to your verbal instruction is possible, but nothing > you can see/verify after the fact. > > A screen of some kind seems to be necessary for convenience - touch or > otherwise! > > Bert VE3NR > > > On 3/25/2019 1:16 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: >>> On Mar 25, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Bert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Phil, >>> >>> Voice interface is OK with household electronics but I doubt we'll see it >>> in our transceivers in the near future. The ham radio market is probably >>> too small to make this feature commercially viable. Again, dollars and >>> cents! >>> OMHO! >>> >>> Bert VE3NR >> >> On the other hand, if your radio had a general-purpose Linux single-board >> computer designed in, with Ethernet access, you could pretty easily include >> voice recognition either locally or internet-enabled at zero cost. >> >> Wayne >> N6KR >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
