You’d probably end up with a computer anyway (except perhaps for portable operations) to do all the functions other than the ones that WSJT handles. For example, I check propagation, point my antenna, receive cluster and RBN spots, maintain a log of tens of thousands of QSOs in various modes and keep track of award progress, upload QSO data to Clublog in real time, upload to LOTW after each session and update my log with results, receive WhatsApp messages, and more. If you had an onboard computer, you would still end up dumping data to an external one on a regular basis anyway. I think the division of labor between a rig and external computer is just about right. Now if you are backpacking and just making a few QSOs for fun, that’s another story.
Victor 4X6GP > On 10 Aug 2019, at 23:40, David Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm certain this is not an original idea, but I wonder if somebody will ever > come out with a dedicated all-in-one notebook-sized portable rig for the > FT-type digital modes. I'm pretty new to FT8/4 but I find it interesting > that when I'm operating it all I ever do with my K3 is turn it on and make > band changes since everything else is done on my computer. I wouldn't even > need to do that much on the K3 if WSJT-X had a button to make band changes. > > Possibly such a unit might look like: > > 1. 12 volt operation (10 watts output) for portable use > > 2. large enough screen to be practical > > 3. running modified (mouseless) version of WSJT-X to allow up/down arrow > keys for: > > a. band selection > b. frequency change in 2 KHz increments > c. mode selection > d. contact selection from activity window > e. TX1-TX6 sequence override > f. transmit enable/disable > > 4. a button to momentarily press for log, press/hold to autolog > > 5. USB port to run modified WSJT-X from flash drive for easy upgrade and log > transfer > > 6. internal antenna tuner (could be manual) > > 7. etc. > > Rigs dedicated to specific modes have never been very popular, but I suspect > that FTx might change that and I suspect an integrated low power SDR version > could end up being fairly inexpensive. A side advantage is that audio levels > would be preset in hardware and we'd see less overdrive situations. ;) > > Anybody know if there is already something like this out there? I can find > small inexpensive transceivers designed for FT8, but they still require a > separate computer. > > Just some ramblings on a rainy day ... > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
