Having used a K3 for a few weeks sometime back, and now having a K3S on
my desk for about 3 years, I can attest that there is a noted
improvement and difference in the SSB receive audio with my K3S. I did
wait on buying a K3S but I did so, only after learning of the improved
SSB receive audio.
As to transmit audio, I find there are several critical areas under the
users control that do affect the SSB transmitted audio. I am not a fan
of external EQ and Processing. Lousy audio going in which is EQ'd and
Processed sounds like lousy audio that is EQ'd and processed. Otherwise
stated, one can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear.
Factors which affect audio are namely mike technique and room
acoustics. And to some noted extent the adjustment or setting of the
K3S internal EQ. In order to determine mike technique one needs to be
able to record and playback their transmitted audio. You can't do it
with headphones and the monitor system. Carefully listen to the
recording. Adjust and repeat as needed. In this process one needs to
move the mike, thus changing mike-to-mouth distance along with talking
direct into the face of the mike. The frequency response of most mikes
will change as one moves off to the side of the mike. Likewise, lip
smacks, nasal noise, denture buzz, and others is affected by
mike-to-mouth distance. If it is a dynamic mike, closer to the mike
will enhance the lower end. Back away and the low end goes down. You
can use this to your advantage, understanding the artifacts of
mike-to-mouth distance.
If one has any fan noise, room reverberation or HVAC noise, I suggest
working closer to the mike and adjusting the MIC level and/or Speech
Processor levels down. Excessive processing brings up unwanted noises.
Of course changing or improving room acoustics is another advantage,
if this can be done. {Topic for another discussion.}
As recommended by Bob Heil, Jim Brown and others including me. FYI -
I'm using a dynamic professional grade Shure SM58 mike direct to the
radio. The TX EQ is as follows: 50 Hz -16dB, 100 Hz -16dB, 200 Hz
-16dB, 400 Hz, -12dB, 800 Hz -0dB, 1.6kHz -0dB, 2.4 kHz +3dB, 3.2 kHz
+6dB. ESSB is OFF. As others have indicated, and as I have
determined, using the record and play back method described above, this
sounds really good. And my voice is no Don Pardeau either! I work
directly on axis and about 1" from the face of the mike. With another
mike brand/model, I find that I must work 4" or about one fist distance
from the face of the mike.
There is no short coming of the K3S receive or transmit audio. It is
excellent communications audio.
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 3/30/2020 8:44 PM, Scott Manthe wrote:
When I was active, I often got unsolicited positive comments on my
audio quality. Partly due to my great voice, I'm sure, but the radio
didn't wreck the raw material.
73,
Scott N9AA
On 3/30/20 9:17 PM, Ignacy wrote:
Many contesters with large budgets use K3 to win or obtain top scores
in SSB
contests. This means that K3 is competitive on SSB with other radios,
and
its flaws in SSB if any are balanced by its advantages.
Early K3 had large AF distortions, fixed by a simple modification.
Ignacy, NO9E
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
